British Columbia (Director of Civil Forfeiture) v. Qin, 2020 BCCA 244
| Judge | The Honourable Chief Justice Bauman; The Honourable Mr. Justice Groberman; The Honourable Mr. Justice Willcock |
| Court | Court of Appeal (British Columbia) |
| Case Date | August 28, 2020 |
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Citations | 2020 BCCA 244 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 practice notes
-
Asset Preservation Orders - Mareva Injunctions
...Wood-Tielenburg Estate v Zacher , 2022 BCSC 1720 at paras 21 and 40 [ Zacher ]; British Columbia (Director of Civil Forfeiture) v Qin , 2020 BCCA 244 at para 65 [ Qin ], citing both a strong prima facie case and a good arguable case. See also Ontario (Securities Commission) v Sextant Capita......
-
Table of cases
...Columbia (Director of Civil Forfeiture) v Qin, 2019 BCCA 345 ....... 70, 73 British Columbia (Director of Civil Forfeiture) v Qin, 2020 BCCA 244 ................................................................................... 183, 212 British Columbia (Forests) v Teal Cedar Products Ltd,......
-
British Columbia (Director of Civil Forfeiture) v Liu,
...of justice. The factors to be considered under this stage were set out in British Columbia (Director of Civil Forfeiture) v. Qin, 2020 BCCA 244: [49] The defendants did not and do not contest that there is a serious question to be tried with respect to the Cash Property's ties to unlaw......
-
British Columbia (Director of Civil Forfeiture) v. Judd, 2020 BCSC 1992
...[6] On August 28, 2020, the Court of Appeal released its decision in that case: British Columbia (Director of Civil Forfeiture) v. Qin, 2020 BCCA 244. The Director argues that the decision serves, if anything, to bolster the basis for Gropper J.'s order and that the IPO should now be extend......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 cases
-
British Columbia (Director of Civil Forfeiture) v Liu,
...of justice. The factors to be considered under this stage were set out in British Columbia (Director of Civil Forfeiture) v. Qin, 2020 BCCA 244: [49] The defendants did not and do not contest that there is a serious question to be tried with respect to the Cash Property's ties to unlaw......
-
British Columbia (Director of Civil Forfeiture) v. Judd, 2020 BCSC 1992
...[6] On August 28, 2020, the Court of Appeal released its decision in that case: British Columbia (Director of Civil Forfeiture) v. Qin, 2020 BCCA 244. The Director argues that the decision serves, if anything, to bolster the basis for Gropper J.'s order and that the IPO should now be extend......
-
2023 BCSC 1007,
...of justice. The factors to be considered under this stage were set out in British Columbia (Director of Civil Forfeiture) v. Qin, 2020 BCCA 244: [49] The defendants did not and do not contest that there is a serious question to be tried with respect to the Cash Property's ties to unlaw......
-
British Columbia (Director of Civil Forfeiture) v. Ballentine,
...of justice Interests of Justice [47] In British Columbia (Director of Civil Forfeiture) v. Qin, 2020 BCCA 244, the Court summarized the factors to be considered in an “interests of justice” analysis (referred to as the Fischer [50] ......
2 books & journal articles
-
Asset Preservation Orders - Mareva Injunctions
...Wood-Tielenburg Estate v Zacher , 2022 BCSC 1720 at paras 21 and 40 [ Zacher ]; British Columbia (Director of Civil Forfeiture) v Qin , 2020 BCCA 244 at para 65 [ Qin ], citing both a strong prima facie case and a good arguable case. See also Ontario (Securities Commission) v Sextant Capita......
-
Table of cases
...Columbia (Director of Civil Forfeiture) v Qin, 2019 BCCA 345 ....... 70, 73 British Columbia (Director of Civil Forfeiture) v Qin, 2020 BCCA 244 ................................................................................... 183, 212 British Columbia (Forests) v Teal Cedar Products Ltd,......