Your World of Legal Intelligence
 Canada | +1 (343) 700 0450

British Columbia (Forests) v. Teal Cedar Products Ltd., 2013 SCC 51

Judgment Cited authorities 9 Cited in 9 Precedent Map Related
Vincent
JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
JudgeLeBel, Louis; Fish, Morris J.; Rothstein, Marshall; Cromwell, Thomas Albert; Moldaver, Michael J.; Karakatsanis, Andromache; Wagner, Richard
Citation2013 SCC 51,[2013] 3 SCR 301
Date04 October 2013
Subject MatterINTEREST,EXPROPRIATION,ARBITRATION,SHIPPING AND NAVIGATION,MINES AND MINERALS
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
Docket Number34769
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
9 practice notes
  • National Gypsum (Canada) Ltd. v. Canadian National Railway Co., (2014) 463 F.T.R. 193 (FC)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Federal Court (Canada)
    • 5 de maio de 2014
    ...107 N.R. 129; 68 D.L.R.(4th) 220 (F.C.A.), refd to. [para. 84]. Teal Cedar Products Ltd. v. British Columbia (Minister of Forests), [2013] 3 S.C.R. 301; 449 N.R. 1; 343 B.C.A.C. 1; 586 W.A.C. 1; 2013 SCC 51, refd to. [para. Febles v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) (2012), ......
  • Shannon v Shannon,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 6 de março de 2023
    ...should not be read as “mere surplusage”: see British Columbia (Forests) v Teal Cedar Products Ltd, 2013 SCC 51 at para 28, [2013] 3 SCR 301; British Columbia v Philip Morris International Inc, 2018 SCC 36 at para 29, [2018] 2 SCR 595. As Gorsuch J (albeit dissenting) observed ......
  • Real Estate Council of Alberta v Moser,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 16 de fevereiro de 2023
    ...not be read as “mere surplusage”: see eg British Columbia (Forests) v Teal Cedar Products Ltd, 2013 SCC 51 at para 28, [2013] 3 SCR 301; British Columbia v Philip Morris International Inc, 2018 SCC 36 at para 29, [2018] 2 SCR 595. As Gorsuch J (albeit dissenting) observed in P......
  • R v Kal Tire, 2019 ABCA 44
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 4 de fevereiro de 2019
    ...taken to enact surplus or unnecessary language in statutes: compare Teal Cedar Products Ltd v British Columbia, 2013 SCC 51 at para 28, [2013] 3 SCR 301; Canada (Attorney General) v Mowat, 2011 SCC 53 at para 38, [2011] 3 SCR 471; British Columbia v Philip Morris International Inc., 2018 SC......
    • Request a trial to view additional results
9 cases
  • Shannon v Shannon, 2023 ABCA 79
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 6 de março de 2023
    ...should not be read as “mere surplusage”: see British Columbia (Forests) v Teal Cedar Products Ltd, 2013 SCC 51 at para 28, [2013] 3 SCR 301; British Columbia v Philip Morris International Inc, 2018 SCC 36 at para 29, [2018] 2 SCR 595. As Gorsuch J (albeit dissenting) observed ......
  • National Gypsum (Canada) Ltd. v. Canadian National Railway Co., (2014) 463 F.T.R. 193 (FC)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Federal Court (Canada)
    • 5 de maio de 2014
    ...107 N.R. 129; 68 D.L.R.(4th) 220 (F.C.A.), refd to. [para. 84]. Teal Cedar Products Ltd. v. British Columbia (Minister of Forests), [2013] 3 S.C.R. 301; 449 N.R. 1; 343 B.C.A.C. 1; 586 W.A.C. 1; 2013 SCC 51, refd to. [para. Febles v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) (2012), ......
  • Real Estate Council of Alberta v Moser,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 16 de fevereiro de 2023
    ...not be read as “mere surplusage”: see eg British Columbia (Forests) v Teal Cedar Products Ltd, 2013 SCC 51 at para 28, [2013] 3 SCR 301; British Columbia v Philip Morris International Inc, 2018 SCC 36 at para 29, [2018] 2 SCR 595. As Gorsuch J (albeit dissenting) observed in P......
  • R v Kal Tire, 2019 ABCA 44
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 4 de fevereiro de 2019
    ...taken to enact surplus or unnecessary language in statutes: compare Teal Cedar Products Ltd v British Columbia, 2013 SCC 51 at para 28, [2013] 3 SCR 301; Canada (Attorney General) v Mowat, 2011 SCC 53 at para 38, [2011] 3 SCR 471; British Columbia v Philip Morris International Inc., 2018 SC......
    • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT