Brookfield Residential (Alberta) LP (Carma Developers LP) v Imperial Oil Limited, 2019 ABCA 35

JudgeJack Watson,Frans Slatter,Thomas W. Wakeling
Citation2019 ABCA 35
Docket Number1703-0111-AC
CourtCourt of Appeal (Alberta)
Date06 February 2019
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
14 practice notes
  • Weir-Jones Technical Services Incorporated v Purolator Courier Ltd, 2019 ABCA 49
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • February 6, 2019
    ...liable for the plaintiff's injuries. This appeal and the companion appeal in Brookfield Residential (Alberta) LP v Imperial Oil Limited, 2019 ABCA 35 were set down to settle the [13] What is the source of this jurisprudential divergence? The short answer is that there has been a paradigm sh......
  • In Summary: It's Still A Balance Of Probabilities
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • February 15, 2019
    ...of 5 judges convened to hear two summary judgment appeals, Weir-Jones and Brookfield Residential (Alberta) LP v. Imperial Oil Limited, 2019 ABCA 35. It was anticipated that this decision would provide clarification on the test for summary judgment in Alberta in light of numerous contradicto......
  • United Inc v Canadian National Railway Company, 2020 ABQB 413
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • July 16, 2020
    ...applications for an extension under s 218 of the EPEA: Brookfield Residential (Alberta) LP (Carma Developers LP) v Imperial Oil Limited, 2019 ABCA 35 [Brookfield]. The Court ruled that such applications should be decided prior to trial. [25] United then sought permission from this Court to ......
  • Alberta Court Of Appeal Sets The Guideline For Extending Limitation Period For Environmental Claims Under The Environmental Protection And Enhancement Act
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • May 20, 2019
    ...Introduction Brookfield Residential (Alberta) LP (Carma Developers LP) v Imperial Oil Limited, 2019 ABCA 35 ("Brookfield"), the Alberta Court of Appeal unanimously confirmed the Court of Queen's Bench treatment of the test that applies when an application is made to extend a limitation peri......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
  • Weir-Jones Technical Services Incorporated v Purolator Courier Ltd, 2019 ABCA 49
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • February 6, 2019
    ...liable for the plaintiff's injuries. This appeal and the companion appeal in Brookfield Residential (Alberta) LP v Imperial Oil Limited, 2019 ABCA 35 were set down to settle the [13] What is the source of this jurisprudential divergence? The short answer is that there has been a paradigm sh......
  • United Inc v Canadian National Railway Company, 2020 ABQB 413
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • July 16, 2020
    ...applications for an extension under s 218 of the EPEA: Brookfield Residential (Alberta) LP (Carma Developers LP) v Imperial Oil Limited, 2019 ABCA 35 [Brookfield]. The Court ruled that such applications should be decided prior to trial. [25] United then sought permission from this Court to ......
  • Ardmore Properties Inc. v Sturgeon School Division No. 24,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • October 12, 2022
    ...the Lands. As stated by the Alberta Court of Appeal in Brookfield Residential (Alberta) LP (Carma Developers LP) v Imperial Oil Limited, 2019 ABCA 35 at para. ...while the damage to the land is continuous, that does not mean that there is a continuous breach of duty that would start the lim......
  • von der Ohe v Porsche Cars Canada Ltd, 2019 ABPC 46
    • Canada
    • Alberta Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • February 20, 2019
    ...are to that in force in December, 2018. [13] See also Brookfield Residential (Alberta) LP (Carma Developers LP) v Imperial Oil Limited, 2019 ABCA 35 [14] Affirmed McEvoy v. Capital Motors Ltd., 1992 CanLII 1079 (BCCA) [15] Emphasis added [16] In Hutton, the plaintiff did not buy the impugne......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
8 firm's commentaries

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT