Bul River Mineral Corp. et al., Re

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
JudgeFitzpatrick, J.
Citation2014 BCSC 645,[2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 645 (SC),[2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 645
Date15 April 2014
Subject MatterPRACTICE,CONTRACTS

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
5 practice notes
  • 1050438 B.C. Ltd. v. Penguin Enterprises Ltd.
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • December 10, 2019
    ...eliminated with respect to reliance on exclusion of liability clauses, which is not the situation here: see Bul River Mineral Corp. (Re), 2014 BCSC 645 at paras. 101–08. Nevertheless, I do not view the doctrine of fundamental breach as applying in this context because the proper question is......
  • Bul River Mineral Corp. et al., Re
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • January 27, 2015
    ...[4] Much of the background of this matter has been described in earlier reasons for judgment: Bul River Mineral Corporation (Re) , 2014 BCSC 645 and 2014 BCSC 1732. For the purposes of today's application, I will briefly summarize the facts. [5] Ross Stanfield, who has since died, was the d......
  • Siddoo v. OJJJ Enterprises Ltd.
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • March 4, 2020
    ...and treat the agreement as at an end, thereby releasing both parties from further performance: Bul River Mineral Corporation (Re), 2014 BCSC 645 at paras. 98–99, citing Doman Forest Products Ltd. v. GMAC Commercial Credit Corp. – Canada, 2007 BCCA 88 at para. 88 and Guara......
  • Quest University Canada (Re)
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • November 26, 2020
    ...Ct. J.) at para. 10; Brainhunter Inc. (Re) (2009), 62 C.B.R. (5th) 41 at para. 10 (Ont. Sup. Ct. J.); Bul River Mineral Corporation (Re), 2014 BCSC 645 at paras. 110–111; and, Green Growth Brands Inc. (Re), 2020 ONSC 3565 at para. 52. [58] There is no doubt that some break fees and related ......
  • Get Started for Free
5 cases
  • 1050438 B.C. Ltd. v. Penguin Enterprises Ltd.
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • December 10, 2019
    ...eliminated with respect to reliance on exclusion of liability clauses, which is not the situation here: see Bul River Mineral Corp. (Re), 2014 BCSC 645 at paras. 101–08. Nevertheless, I do not view the doctrine of fundamental breach as applying in this context because the proper question is......
  • Bul River Mineral Corp. et al., Re
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • January 27, 2015
    ...[4] Much of the background of this matter has been described in earlier reasons for judgment: Bul River Mineral Corporation (Re) , 2014 BCSC 645 and 2014 BCSC 1732. For the purposes of today's application, I will briefly summarize the facts. [5] Ross Stanfield, who has since died, was the d......
  • Siddoo v. OJJJ Enterprises Ltd.
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • March 4, 2020
    ...and treat the agreement as at an end, thereby releasing both parties from further performance: Bul River Mineral Corporation (Re), 2014 BCSC 645 at paras. 98–99, citing Doman Forest Products Ltd. v. GMAC Commercial Credit Corp. – Canada, 2007 BCCA 88 at para. 88 and Guarantee Co. of North A......
  • Quest University Canada (Re)
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • November 26, 2020
    ...Ct. J.) at para. 10; Brainhunter Inc. (Re) (2009), 62 C.B.R. (5th) 41 at para. 10 (Ont. Sup. Ct. J.); Bul River Mineral Corporation (Re), 2014 BCSC 645 at paras. 110–111; and, Green Growth Brands Inc. (Re), 2020 ONSC 3565 at para. 52. [58] There is no doubt that some break fees and related ......
  • Get Started for Free