Burridge v. Hardy, 2018 ONSC 202

JurisdictionOntario
JudgeVERBEEM J.
Citation2018 ONSC 202
Docket NumberDC 1921/17 (Sarnia)
CourtSuperior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
Date09 January 2018
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 practice notes
  • Owasco Canadian Car & Camper Rental Ltd. v. Fitzgerald et al., 2021 ONSC 7235
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • November 10, 2021
    ...by purchasing collision coverage.  See also Quality Car Rentals Inc. v. Sedaghat, 2019 ONSC 5431 at para 12; Burridge v. Hardy, 2018 ONSC 202 at paras. 13-22. [18]        Specifically, s. 263(5)(a) states that when the s. 263 Direct Compensation ......
  • Marrocco v. Ferndale Vineyards,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • June 25, 2021
    ...is plain and obvious to see.  An error is overriding when it goes to the root of the challenged finding of fact: Burridge v. Hardy, 2018 ONSC 202 (Div. Ct.) at para. [24]        An appeal from a decision of a Master is not a re-hearing.  On quest......
  • The Right To Subrogate: Court Finds Bailment As An Exception To S. 263 Of The Insurance Act
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • November 27, 2018
    ...damage following a motor vehicle accident. On January 9, 2018, the Divisional Court released a decision in the case of Burridge v. Hardy, 2018 ONSC 202 (Burridge) dismissing an appeal from the 2016 small claims court decision. Burridge stands for the proposition that "a right of action agai......
2 cases
  • Owasco Canadian Car & Camper Rental Ltd. v. Fitzgerald et al., 2021 ONSC 7235
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • November 10, 2021
    ...by purchasing collision coverage.  See also Quality Car Rentals Inc. v. Sedaghat, 2019 ONSC 5431 at para 12; Burridge v. Hardy, 2018 ONSC 202 at paras. 13-22. [18]        Specifically, s. 263(5)(a) states that when the s. 263 Direct Compensation ......
  • Marrocco v. Ferndale Vineyards,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • June 25, 2021
    ...is plain and obvious to see.  An error is overriding when it goes to the root of the challenged finding of fact: Burridge v. Hardy, 2018 ONSC 202 (Div. Ct.) at para. [24]        An appeal from a decision of a Master is not a re-hearing.  On quest......
1 firm's commentaries

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT