Buschau et al. v. Canada (Attorney General) et al., [2012] N.R. Uned. 38
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Citation | [2012] N.R. Uned. 38,[2012] N.R. Uned. 38 (FCA),2012 FCA 100 |
| Subject Matter | PRACTICE |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Canada) |
| Date | 23 March 2012 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 practice notes
-
Table of cases
...106 Roeder v Islamic Republic of Iran, 195 F Supp 2d 140 (DDC 2002) ..........384–85 Rogers Communications Inc v Buschau, 2012 FCA 100 ......................................17 Rohani v Rohani, 2004 BCSC 353 ........................................................................ 15 Royal Ba......
-
Introduction to Legal Research and Writing
...absence of evidence surrounding the details of the online searches, a nominal amount was awarded. 30 Rogers Communications Inc v Buschau , 2012 FCA 100 at para 31 (charges allowed but reduced due to lack of receipts); Astrazeneca AB v Apotex Inc , 2009 FC 822 (LexisNexis Quicklaw charges al......
-
Lessard‑Gauvin v. Canada (Attorney General), 2019 FCA 233
...that argument, citing the consistent doctrine of the federal courts in this regard (Rogers Communications Incorporated v. Buschau, 2012 FCA 100 at paragraphs 9, 14, 22 [Rogers]; Horn v. Canada, 2010 FC 501 at paragraph 26; Ferme avicole Kiamika Inc. v. Canada (Agriculture and Agri‑Food), 20......
-
Zhuk v. Canada (Attorney General), 2022 FC 1215
...dated March 18, 2020, were both silent with respect to costs. The Respondent cited the decisions, Buschau v Rogers Communications Inc., 2012 FCA 100, at paragraph 29, and Ruckpaul v Canada, 2004 FC 618, at paragraphs 3 and 4, regarding Court decisions being silent on costs. In reply, at par......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 cases
-
Lessard‑Gauvin v. Canada (Attorney General), 2019 FCA 233
...that argument, citing the consistent doctrine of the federal courts in this regard (Rogers Communications Incorporated v. Buschau, 2012 FCA 100 at paragraphs 9, 14, 22 [Rogers]; Horn v. Canada, 2010 FC 501 at paragraph 26; Ferme avicole Kiamika Inc. v. Canada (Agriculture and Agri‑Food), 20......
-
Zhuk v. Canada (Attorney General), 2022 FC 1215
...dated March 18, 2020, were both silent with respect to costs. The Respondent cited the decisions, Buschau v Rogers Communications Inc., 2012 FCA 100, at paragraph 29, and Ruckpaul v Canada, 2004 FC 618, at paragraphs 3 and 4, regarding Court decisions being silent on costs. In reply, at par......
-
Truehope Nutritional Support Ltd. et al. v. Canada (Attorney General) et al., 2013 FC 1153
...must remain in or close to the courtroom, are allowable (see: Halford ( supra ) at paragraph 205 and Buschau v Rogers Communications Inc , 2012 FCA 100 at paragraph 17). In keeping with these decisions, I will reduce the number of hours claimed to remove one hour from each day claimed to ac......
-
Lessard-Gauvin v. Canada (Attorney General), 2019 FC 979
...Court of Appeal states that the value in effect on the day of assessment must be used: Rogers Communications Incorporated v Buschau, 2012 FCA 100 at paras 9, 14, 22; Horn v Canada, 2010 FC 501 at para 26; Ferme avicole Kiamika Inc v Canada (Agriculture and Agri-Food), 2006 FC 1392 at para 3......
2 books & journal articles
-
Table of cases
...106 Roeder v Islamic Republic of Iran, 195 F Supp 2d 140 (DDC 2002) ..........384–85 Rogers Communications Inc v Buschau, 2012 FCA 100 ......................................17 Rohani v Rohani, 2004 BCSC 353 ........................................................................ 15 Royal Ba......
-
Introduction to Legal Research and Writing
...absence of evidence surrounding the details of the online searches, a nominal amount was awarded. 30 Rogers Communications Inc v Buschau , 2012 FCA 100 at para 31 (charges allowed but reduced due to lack of receipts); Astrazeneca AB v Apotex Inc , 2009 FC 822 (LexisNexis Quicklaw charges al......