C.D.A v P.R.B., 2020 BCSC 1337

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeHonourable Mr. Justice N. Smith
Citation2020 BCSC 1337
Date10 September 2020
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Docket NumberE58702
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • Arulsothynathan v. Ganeshalingam,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • May 17, 2021
    ...of the Court and provide information that simply cannot be gleamed from affidavits or even viva voce evidence: C.D.A. v. P.R.B., 2020 BCSC 1337 at para. 10, and C.D.M. v. K.M.A.W., 2019 BCSC 608 at para. [59]        The views in the s. 211 Report are just ......
  • 2023 BCSC 544,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2023
    ...of the Court and provide information that simply cannot be gleamed from affidavits or even viva voce evidence: C.D.A. v. P.R.B., 2020 BCSC 1337 at para. 10, and C.D.M. v. K.M.A.W., 2019 BCSC 608 at para. 32. [59] The views in the s. 211 Report are just one part of the picture that I must tr......
  • Ellis v Alvarez,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • March 1, 2023
    ...of the Court and provide information that simply cannot be gleamed from affidavits or even viva voce evidence: C.D.A. v. P.R.B., 2020 BCSC 1337 at para. 10, and C.D.M. v. K.M.A.W., 2019 BCSC 608 at para. 32. [59] The views in the s. 211 Report are just one part of the picture that I must tr......
  • Ellis v. Alvarez,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • March 1, 2023
    ...of the Court and provide information that simply cannot be gleamed from affidavits or even viva voce evidence: C.D.A. v. P.R.B., 2020 BCSC 1337 at para. 10, and C.D.M. v. K.M.A.W., 2019 BCSC 608 at para. [59]      The views in the s. 211 Report are just one part of ......
4 cases
  • Arulsothynathan v. Ganeshalingam,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • May 17, 2021
    ...of the Court and provide information that simply cannot be gleamed from affidavits or even viva voce evidence: C.D.A. v. P.R.B., 2020 BCSC 1337 at para. 10, and C.D.M. v. K.M.A.W., 2019 BCSC 608 at para. [59]        The views in the s. 211 Report are just ......
  • 2023 BCSC 544,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2023
    ...of the Court and provide information that simply cannot be gleamed from affidavits or even viva voce evidence: C.D.A. v. P.R.B., 2020 BCSC 1337 at para. 10, and C.D.M. v. K.M.A.W., 2019 BCSC 608 at para. 32. [59] The views in the s. 211 Report are just one part of the picture that I must tr......
  • Ellis v Alvarez,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • March 1, 2023
    ...of the Court and provide information that simply cannot be gleamed from affidavits or even viva voce evidence: C.D.A. v. P.R.B., 2020 BCSC 1337 at para. 10, and C.D.M. v. K.M.A.W., 2019 BCSC 608 at para. 32. [59] The views in the s. 211 Report are just one part of the picture that I must tr......
  • Ellis v. Alvarez,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • March 1, 2023
    ...of the Court and provide information that simply cannot be gleamed from affidavits or even viva voce evidence: C.D.A. v. P.R.B., 2020 BCSC 1337 at para. 10, and C.D.M. v. K.M.A.W., 2019 BCSC 608 at para. [59]      The views in the s. 211 Report are just one part of ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT