C.L.H. v. K.A.G., 2022 BCSC 994
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Veenstra |
| Citation | 2022 BCSC 994 |
| Docket Number | S17849 |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Date | 14 June 2022 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
2 practice notes
-
2024 BCSC 353,
...to $265,000 in 2014 dollars (see D.M. at para. 72) and this has continued to be accepted: C.M.A. at para. 129 and C.L.H. v K.A.G., 2022 BCSC 994 at para. 341. Translated into 2021 dollars, that range would be $175,000 to 131 The lower end of this range would be inappropriate here because a ......
-
Gorup-Paule v Palmatier,
...to $265,000 in 2014 dollars (see D.M. at para. 72) and this has continued to be accepted: C.M.A. at para. 129 and C.L.H. v K.A.G., 2022 BCSC 994 at para. 341. Translated into 2021 dollars, that range would be $175,000 to 131 The lower end of this range would be inappropriate here because a ......
2 cases
-
2024 BCSC 353,
...to $265,000 in 2014 dollars (see D.M. at para. 72) and this has continued to be accepted: C.M.A. at para. 129 and C.L.H. v K.A.G., 2022 BCSC 994 at para. 341. Translated into 2021 dollars, that range would be $175,000 to 131 The lower end of this range would be inappropriate here because a ......
-
Gorup-Paule v Palmatier,
...to $265,000 in 2014 dollars (see D.M. at para. 72) and this has continued to be accepted: C.M.A. at para. 129 and C.L.H. v K.A.G., 2022 BCSC 994 at para. 341. Translated into 2021 dollars, that range would be $175,000 to 131 The lower end of this range would be inappropriate here because a ......