C.M. v. N.L., 2020 BCSC 3
| Judge | Honourable Madam Justice Dillon |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Case Date | January 03, 2020 |
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Citations | 2020 BCSC 3 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
15 practice notes
-
Parenting Arrangements After Divorce
...Orders for supervised parenting with respect to a teenager are rare but the circumstances of a particular case may 176 CM v NL, 2020 BCSC 3 at para 177 M(BP) v M(BLDE) (1992), 42 RFL (3d) 349 (Ont CA), citing Norris Weisman, “On Access after Parental Separation” (1992) 36 RFL (3d) 35 at 74,......
-
Parenting Arrangements after Divorce
...pointed out that the trial judge’s order in no way precluded a future application to vary the existing order upon proof of 150 CM v NL, 2020 BCSC 3 at para 151 M(BP) v M(BLDE) (1992), 42 RFL (3d) 349 (Ont CA), citing Norris Weisman, “On Access after Parental Separation” (1992) 36 RFL (3d) 3......
-
MFSJ862 v. FFSJ862,
...father claims that the Condos should be excluded property. He bears the onus of persuading the Court to exclude the property. CM v. NL, 2020 BCSC 3 at para 171 sets out the evidentiary requirements to prove an excluded property The legal test for establishing a claim for excluded property u......
-
Liapis v. Keshow,
...decision to preclude such an approach, but rather that it was impractical due to the insufficiency of the evidence. [265] In C.M. v. N.L., 2020 BCSC 3, Justice Dillon considered the tracing of excluded property and concluded that the pro rata method of tracing might be appropriate in some c......
Request a trial to view additional results
13 cases
-
MFSJ862 v. FFSJ862,
...father claims that the Condos should be excluded property. He bears the onus of persuading the Court to exclude the property. CM v. NL, 2020 BCSC 3 at para 171 sets out the evidentiary requirements to prove an excluded property The legal test for establishing a claim for excluded property u......
-
Liapis v. Keshow,
...decision to preclude such an approach, but rather that it was impractical due to the insufficiency of the evidence. [265] In C.M. v. N.L., 2020 BCSC 3, Justice Dillon considered the tracing of excluded property and concluded that the pro rata method of tracing might be appropriate in some c......
-
T.S.S.W v. A.C.W.,
...v. T.F.T., 2016 BCSC 134 at para. 103. [187] Allegations of abuse were at issue in C.M. v. N.L., 2020 BCSC 3, where Dillon J. summarized some of the applicable principles at paras. [99] In the context of protection of c......
-
V.K.W.W. v. K.A.M.G.,
...1339 at para. 54. Supervised parenting time is not appropriate where its purpose is to provide comfort to the other parent, C.M. v. N.L., 2020 BCSC 3 at para. 104. A continuation of supervised parenting time in this case has no support in the evidence and thus cannot be justified as a matte......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Parenting Arrangements After Divorce
...Orders for supervised parenting with respect to a teenager are rare but the circumstances of a particular case may 176 CM v NL, 2020 BCSC 3 at para 177 M(BP) v M(BLDE) (1992), 42 RFL (3d) 349 (Ont CA), citing Norris Weisman, “On Access after Parental Separation” (1992) 36 RFL (3d) 35 at 74,......
-
Parenting Arrangements after Divorce
...pointed out that the trial judge’s order in no way precluded a future application to vary the existing order upon proof of 150 CM v NL, 2020 BCSC 3 at para 151 M(BP) v M(BLDE) (1992), 42 RFL (3d) 349 (Ont CA), citing Norris Weisman, “On Access after Parental Separation” (1992) 36 RFL (3d) 3......