C.P. v. K.W.A., 2018 BCSC 332

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeThe Honourable Madam Justice Choi
Citation2018 BCSC 332
Date05 March 2018
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Docket NumberE144589
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
23 practice notes
  • Pike v. Pike,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador (Canada)
    • February 5, 2019
    ...Wiscombe v. Wiscombe, 2018 NLCA 36; A.M.D. v. A.J.P. (2002), 219 D.L.R. (4th) 319, 117 A.C.W.S. (3d) 120 (Ont. C.A.); C.P. v. K.W.A., 2018 BCSC 332; Vennels v. Vennels (1993), 76 B.C.L.R. (2d) 69, 38 A.C.W.S. (3d) 752 (B.C. S.C.); Hickey v. Princ, 2015 ONSC 5596; Bullock v. Bullock (2004), ......
  • Y.L. v. G.L., 2020 BCSC 808
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • May 29, 2020
    ...as opposed to disposed of into existing property, then no excluded property claim can be made in relation to it: C.P. v. K.W.A., 2018 BCSC 332 at para. 100. If excluded property has decreased in value, the party who has (or had) an interest in that excluded property, is not entitled to seek......
  • S.C.A. v W.C.C.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • April 12, 2023
    ...himself. The factors he considered closely mirror the factors enumerated in Nearing v. Sauer, 2015 BCSC 58 and applied in C.P. v. K.W.A., 2018 BCSC 332. In Nearing, Fleming J. wrote: [56] … Typically when the parties dispute the date of separation, the court's analysis focuses o......
  • N.K. v. M.H., 2020 BCCA 121
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • April 30, 2020
    ...income, which can be used to compare their respective positions and determine whether further support is warranted: see C.P. v. K.W.A., 2018 BCSC 332 at paras. 334–337; Pepper v. Pepper, 2016 BCSC 1542 at paras. 87–89; and T.(P.) v. T.(M.), 2016 BCSC 316 at paras. 83–86. Unfortunately, the ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
23 cases
  • Pike v. Pike,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador (Canada)
    • February 5, 2019
    ...Wiscombe v. Wiscombe, 2018 NLCA 36; A.M.D. v. A.J.P. (2002), 219 D.L.R. (4th) 319, 117 A.C.W.S. (3d) 120 (Ont. C.A.); C.P. v. K.W.A., 2018 BCSC 332; Vennels v. Vennels (1993), 76 B.C.L.R. (2d) 69, 38 A.C.W.S. (3d) 752 (B.C. S.C.); Hickey v. Princ, 2015 ONSC 5596; Bullock v. Bullock (2004), ......
  • Y.L. v. G.L., 2020 BCSC 808
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • May 29, 2020
    ...as opposed to disposed of into existing property, then no excluded property claim can be made in relation to it: C.P. v. K.W.A., 2018 BCSC 332 at para. 100. If excluded property has decreased in value, the party who has (or had) an interest in that excluded property, is not entitled to seek......
  • S.C.A. v W.C.C.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • April 12, 2023
    ...himself. The factors he considered closely mirror the factors enumerated in Nearing v. Sauer, 2015 BCSC 58 and applied in C.P. v. K.W.A., 2018 BCSC 332. In Nearing, Fleming J. wrote: [56] … Typically when the parties dispute the date of separation, the court's analysis focuses o......
  • N.K. v. M.H., 2020 BCCA 121
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • April 30, 2020
    ...income, which can be used to compare their respective positions and determine whether further support is warranted: see C.P. v. K.W.A., 2018 BCSC 332 at paras. 334–337; Pepper v. Pepper, 2016 BCSC 1542 at paras. 87–89; and T.(P.) v. T.(M.), 2016 BCSC 316 at paras. 83–86. Unfortunately, the ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT