C.T.G. v. R.R.G.

JurisdictionSaskatchewan
JudgePOPESCUL C.J.Q.B.
Citation2016 SKQB 387
Date25 November 2016
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
Docket NumberDIV 547 of 2007

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
29 practice notes
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (December 9 – December 13, 2019)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • December 17, 2019
    ...1985, c. 3 (2nd Supp.) Family Law Rules, O. Reg. 114/99, r. 2(5)(c), Martin v. Martin, 1981 CarswellBC 773 (C.A.), C.T.G. v. R.R.G., 2016 SKQB 387, 86 R.F.L. (7th) 312, Harper v. Harper (1991), 78 D.L.R. (4th) 548 (Ont. Gen. Div.), F.J.V. v. W.K.S., 2019 BCCA 67, McKitty v. Hayani, 2019 ONC......
  • Effect of order or agreement or other arrangement that benefits child; consent orders
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Child Support Guidelines in Canada, 2017
    • August 29, 2017
    ...45 Duncan v. Duncan , [1999] B.C.J. No. 2201 (C.A.). 46 Fonseca v. Fonseca , [1998] B.C.J. No. 2772 (S.C.); see also C.T.G. v. R.R.G. , 2016 SKQB 387. 47 Handy v. Handy , [1999] B.C.J. No. 6 (S.C.). 48 Davie v. Davie , [1998] B.C.J. No. 1691 (S.C.). 49 Garard v. Garard , [1998] B.C.J. No. 2......
  • Form and Types of Order
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Child Support Guidelines in Canada, 2022
    • July 27, 2022
    ...v Sochowski, 2020 ABCA 59 at para 11; Gibb v Gibb, [2005] BCJ No 2730 (SC); Miller v White, 2018 PECA 11 (interim order); CTG v RRG, 2016 SKQB 387. Lafrentz v Palmer, 2021 BCSC 1332; Jacobson v Jacobson, 2011 SKQB 402; Poultney v Poultney, 2011 SKQB 420. See also Long v Sun, 2019 BCSC Fuzi ......
  • Form and types of order
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Child Support Guidelines in Canada, 2017
    • August 29, 2017
    ...3, s. 15.1(4). 7 Moore v. Fernandes , [2001] O.J. No. 5192 (S.C.J.). 8 Gibb v. Gibb , [2005] B.C.J. No. 2730 (S.C.); C.T.G. v. R.R.G. , 2016 SKQB 387. 9 Jacobson v. Jacobson , 2011 SKQB 402; Poultney v. Poultney , 2011 SKQB 420. 10 Fuzi v. Fuzi , [1999] B.C.J. No. 2263 (S.C.). 11 Grail v. G......
  • Get Started for Free
8 cases
  • D.A. v. T.A,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • September 21, 2017
    ...interim determination of retroactive support obligations: Graham, Belfour v Belfour, 2007 SKQB 295, 303 Sask R 33, and C.T.G. v R.R.G., 2016 SKQB 387 at para 27. There are also cases, however, where this Court has directly considered and determined an application to expunge arrears accumula......
  • Boutin v Boutin,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • March 28, 2023
    ...to look only to employment income was reasonable in view of the s. 21 income information before doing so. She cites C.T.G. v R.R.G., 2016 SKQB 387 at para 52, 86 RFL (7th) 312, and on MacEachern v Bell, 2019 ONSC 4720 at para 57, 33 RFL (8th) 68, in support of this proposition. She notes th......
  • Boutin v Boutin,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • March 29, 2023
    ...to look only to employment income was reasonable in view of the s. 21 income information before doing so. She cites C.T.G. v R.R.G., 2016 SKQB 387 at para 52, 86 RFL (7th) 312, and on MacEachern v Bell, 2019 ONSC 4720 at para 57, 33 RFL (8th) 68, in support of this proposition. She notes th......
  • Richardson v. Richardson,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • December 13, 2019
    ...them if they are not in the best interests of the children: Martin v. Martin, 1981 CarswellBC 773 (C.A.), at para. 7; C.T.G. v. R.R.G., 2016 SKQB 387, 86 R.F.L. (7th) 312, at para. 11; and Harper v. Harper (1991), 78 D.L.R. (4th) 548 (Ont. Gen. Div.), at p. 553. This authority must be exerc......
  • Get Started for Free
2 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (December 9 – December 13, 2019)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • December 17, 2019
    ...1985, c. 3 (2nd Supp.) Family Law Rules, O. Reg. 114/99, r. 2(5)(c), Martin v. Martin, 1981 CarswellBC 773 (C.A.), C.T.G. v. R.R.G., 2016 SKQB 387, 86 R.F.L. (7th) 312, Harper v. Harper (1991), 78 D.L.R. (4th) 548 (Ont. Gen. Div.), F.J.V. v. W.K.S., 2019 BCCA 67, McKitty v. Hayani, 2019 ONC......
  • Settlement Agreements Are Not A Done Deal!
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • October 5, 2022
    ...Footnotes 1 Richardson v. Richardson, 2019 ONCA 983 2 Ibid 3 Martin v. Martin, 1981 CarswellBC 773 (C.A.), at para. 7; C.T.G. v. R.R.G., 2016 SKQB 387, 86 R.F.L. (7th) 312, at para. 11; and Harper v. Harper (1991), 1991 CanLII 8330 (ON SC), 78 D.L.R. (4th) 548 (Ont. Gen. Div.), at p. 4 Fami......
17 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Child Support Guidelines in Canada, 2024
    • Invalid date
    ...CTG v RRG, 2016 SKQB 387..................................................................................................432, 447, 453, 456 CU v MR, [1997] QJ No 3289 CU v MR, [1998] QJ No 3443 (CS)..................................................................................................
  • Effect of order or agreement or other arrangement that benefits child; consent orders
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Child Support Guidelines in Canada, 2020
    • June 23, 2019
    ...Family Relations Act). 45 Duncan v Duncan, [1999] BCJ No 2201 (CA). 46 Fonseca v Fonseca, [1998] BCJ No 2772 (SC); see also CTG v RRG, 2016 SKQB 387. 47 Handy v Handy, [1999] BCJ No 6 (SC). 48 Davie v Davie, [1998] BCJ No 1691 (SC). 49 Garard v Garard, [1998] BCJ No 2076 (CA) (application t......
  • Form and types of order
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Child Support Guidelines in Canada, 2020
    • June 23, 2019
    ...v Fernandes, [2001] OJ No 5192 (SCJ). 8 Gibb v Gibb, [2005] BCJ No 2730 (SC); Miller v White, 2018 PECA 11 (interim order); CTG v RRG, 2016 SKQB 387. 9 Jacobson v Jacobson, 2011 SKQB 402; Poultney v Poultney, 2011 SKQB 420. 10 Fuzi v Fuzi, [1999] BCJ No 2263 (SC). 11 Grail v Grail (1990), 2......
  • Chapter 10: Parenting Arrangements After Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law (Tenth Edition)
    • April 14, 2025
    ...them if they are not in the best interests of the children: Martin v. Martin, 1981 CarswellBC 773 (C.A.), at para. 7; C.T.G. v. R.R.G., 2016 SKQB 387, 86 R.F.L. (7th) 312, at para. 11; and Harper v. Harper (1991), 1991 CAN LII 8330 (On SC), 78 D.L.R. (4th) 548 Gen. Div.), at p. 553. This au......
  • Get Started for Free