Camick v. Camick, (1975) 12 N.B.R.(2d) 463 (QB)
Judge | Stratton, J. |
Court | Court of Queen's Bench of New Brunswick (Canada) |
Case Date | October 08, 1975 |
Jurisdiction | New Brunswick |
Citations | (1975), 12 N.B.R.(2d) 463 (QB) |
Camick v. Camick (1975), 12 N.B.R.(2d) 463 (QB);
12 R.N.-B.(2e) 463; 10 A.P.R. 463
MLB headnote and full text
Sommaire et texte intégral
Camick v. Camick
Indexed As: Camick v. Camick
Répertorié: Camick v. Camick
New Brunswick Court of Queen's Bench
Stratton, J.
October 8, 1975.
Summary:
Résumé:
This headnote contains no summary.
Family Law - Topic 1889
Custody of children - Considerations in awarding custody - Capacity of parents to care for a child - 3 year old girl - The New Brunswick Court of Queen's Bench reviewed the home life which the divorced mother and father were able to provide - The Court of Queen's Bench awarded custody of the girl to the father.
Cases Noticed:
Pollard v. Pollard (1974), 7 N.B.R.(2d) 120, folld. [para. 4].
Haughn v. Haughn (1974), 8 N.B.R.(2d) 428, folld. [para. 4].
McKee v. McKee, [1955] 2 D.L.R. 657, folld. [para. 5].
Dyment v. Dyment, [1969] 2 O.R. 748, folld. [para. 5].
Stevenson v. Florant, [1925] 4 D.L.R. 530, folld. [para. 7].
Counsel:
Rodney J. Gillis, for the petitioner;
Joanna J. Ringrose, for the respondent.
This application was heard by STRATTON, J., at Saint John, N.B., on September 10 and 11, 1975. Judgment was delivered by STRATTON, J., on October 8, 1975.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Camick v. Camick, (1977) 19 N.B.R.(2d) 441 (QB)
...of his wife's adultery; the contested action was tried by Mr. Justice Stratton who on October 8, 1975, granted a decree nisi [See 12 N.B.R.(2d) 463; 10 A.P.R. 463.]; at that time both parents had returned to live with their own parents, i.e. the grandparents of the child, and in his reasons......
-
Camick v. Camick, (1977) 19 N.B.R.(2d) 441 (QB)
...of his wife's adultery; the contested action was tried by Mr. Justice Stratton who on October 8, 1975, granted a decree nisi [See 12 N.B.R.(2d) 463; 10 A.P.R. 463.]; at that time both parents had returned to live with their own parents, i.e. the grandparents of the child, and in his reasons......