Can I trust you? Exploring the ways in which sexual orientation disclosure affects the relationship between LGB leaders and their followers

Date01 June 2017
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.1435
AuthorMichèle A. Bowring
Published date01 June 2017
Can I trust you? Exploring the ways in
which sexual orientation disclosure
affects the relationship between LGB
leaders and their followers
Michèle A. Bowring*
University of Guelph
Abstract
This paper presents a model of the effects of sexual orientation
disclosure based on a review of the trust and disclosure
literature in the workplace. This model suggests that, when
leaders choose to come out, claiming LGB identity versus
downplaying it leads to subordinate trust in the leader
(FTL). This trust, in turn, inf‌luences positive outcomes such
as job performance, job satisfaction, and organizational
citizenship behaviours (OCB). Trust also moderates the inf‌lu-
ence of follower attributes and contextual factors on these
positive outcomes. I offer a number of propositions for future
research in this area. Copyright © 2017 ASAC. Published by
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Keywords: LGB, trust, disclosure, leadership, leader-
follower relationship
Résumé
Dans cet article, je minspire des travaux antérieurs sur la
conf‌iance et la divulgation en milieu professionnel pour
proposer un modèle permettant danalyser les effets de la
divulgation de lorientation sexuelle. Daprès ce modèle,
lorsque les leaders choisissent daff‌irmer leur appartenance
à la communauté LGB (lesbienne, gays et bisexuels) au lieu
de la nier, ils gagnent la conf‌iance de leurs subalternes
(FTL). Non seulement cette conf‌iance inf‌luence positivement
le rendement au travail, la satisfaction professionnelle et les
comportements citoyens au sein de lorganisation (OCB),
mais aussi elle modère linf‌luence que les attributs des exéc-
utants et les facteurs contextuels ont sur les effets positifs
cités. Dans la conclusion, je propose quelques pistes pour
des recherches futures Copyright © 2017 ASAC. Published
by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Mots-clés: LGB, conf‌iance, divulgation, leadership, relation
leader-exécutant.
In many countries, recent social, cultural and legislative
changes have brought about a stronger emphasis on diversity
in organizations as well as a more welcoming environment
for lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) employees. As a result,
the proportion of employees who disclose their nonhetero-
sexual orientation (i.e., come out) in the workplace is in-
creasing. For example, in their recent survey of 983 LGB
employees in the US, the Center for Talent Innovation found
that 59% were out at workan increase of 7% from the
previous year (CTI, 2013). As more people come out, it is
important to understand the coming out process and its
consequences.
Coming out is an indication of reciprocal trust between
the person who comes out and the person to whom they
come out. In the workplace, one relationship in which trust
is important is the relationship between leaders and their
followers. Without follower trust in the leader (FTL), leaders
cannot lead (Argyris, 1962). Important issues for leaders who
come out, then, include managing their sexual orientation
identity in a way that has positive effects on that relationship.
Thus, an important question becomes: What happens to the
trust between leader and their followers when the leader
comes out?
While the extant literature has looked at the effects of
disclosure on individuals who come out (e.g., Griff‌ith & Hebl,
2002), their coworkers (e.g., King, Reilly, & Hebl, 2008), and
leaders themselves (e.g., Chang & Bowring, 2015), no one has
examined the effect on followers. In particular, no one has
looked at how leader behaviours, follower attributes, and
I would like to thank the editor of this special issue, Dr. Ed Ng, and the
anonymous reviewer for their very helpful comments and suggestions.
*Please address correspondence to: Michèle A Bowring, Department of
Management, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, ON,
N1G 2W1. Email: mbowring@uoguelph.ca
Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences
Revue canadienne des sciences de ladministration
34: 170181 (2017)
Published online in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com) DOI: 10.1002/CJAS.1435
Can J Adm Sci
34(2), 170181 (2017)Copyright © 2017 ASAC. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 170

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT