Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Inarukundo, [2015] F.T.R. Uned. 269
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Judge | Harrington, J. |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | EDUCATION,CIVIL RIGHTS,IMMIGRATION AND REFUGEE,ADMINISTRATIVE LAW |
| Citation | [2015] F.T.R. Uned. 269,2015 FC 314,[2015] F.T.R. Uned. 269 (FC) |
| Date | 12 March 2015 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Alvarez Rivera v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 99
...are matters of procedural fairness: Nagulesan at paragraph 17, Shuaib at paragraph 31; Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v Inarukundo, 2015 FC 314 at paragraphs 3(b), 4, 10; Farkas v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2014 FC 542 at paragraphs 10–11. But once made, the correctness of ......
-
Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v. Sabeni, 2018 FC 800
...of Citizenship and Immigration) v Kabunda, 20`15 FC 1213 at para 22; and Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v Inarukundo, 2015 FC 314 [Inarukundo] at para 7-8). [23] However, as the Respondent points out, the presumption explained in these authorities is a rebuttable one......
2 cases
-
Alvarez Rivera v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 99
...are matters of procedural fairness: Nagulesan at paragraph 17, Shuaib at paragraph 31; Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v Inarukundo, 2015 FC 314 at paragraphs 3(b), 4, 10; Farkas v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2014 FC 542 at paragraphs 10–11. But once made, the correctness of ......
-
Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v. Sabeni, 2018 FC 800
...of Citizenship and Immigration) v Kabunda, 20`15 FC 1213 at para 22; and Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v Inarukundo, 2015 FC 314 [Inarukundo] at para 7-8). [23] However, as the Respondent points out, the presumption explained in these authorities is a rebuttable one......