Canada Trust Co. v. Potomski, [2015] O.A.C. Uned. 284

JurisdictionOntario
JudgePardu, J.A.
CourtCourt of Appeal (Ontario)
Subject MatterPRACTICE,MORTGAGES
Citation[2015] O.A.C. Uned. 284,[2015] O.A.C. Uned. 284 (CA),2015 ONCA 324
Date08 May 2015
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 practice notes
  • Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (May 4 – 8, 2015)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • May 13, 2015
    ...excluded from the market. Therefore, remedial unjust enrichment was not available to Apotex. The Canada Trust Company v. Potomski, 2015 ONCA 324 [Pardu J.A. (In Counsel: R. J. Potomski, acting in person J. Kukla, for the respondent Keywords: Real Estate Law, Mortgages, Costs of Enforcement ......
  • U.S. Parent Could Be Liable For Breaches Of Ontario Franchise Laws Even Though Not A Party To The Franchise Agreement
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • June 2, 2016
    ...under Ontario's Arthur Wishart Act franchise legislation (Addison Chevrolet Buick GMC Limited v. General Motors of Canada Limited, 2015 ONCA 324). Whether a U.S. parent company ultimately would be held liable is open for debate, because the Ontario Court of Appeal simply considered whether ......
  • 305 Dundas W Inc. v. 2324702 Ontario Inc., 2019 ONSC 5068
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • August 29, 2019
    ...name="_ftn5" title>[5] 2014 ONCA 546, 122 O.R. (3d) 472, at paras 21-23. [6] 2015 ONCA 324, 72 C.P.C. (7th) 232, at paras [7] 2015 ONCA 249, 126 O.R. (3d) 101, at paras 24, 26, 28, and 37-38. [8] strength of one may compensate for the weakness of another.  Generally, the court must dec......
1 cases
  • 305 Dundas W Inc. v. 2324702 Ontario Inc., 2019 ONSC 5068
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • August 29, 2019
    ...name="_ftn5" title>[5] 2014 ONCA 546, 122 O.R. (3d) 472, at paras 21-23. [6] 2015 ONCA 324, 72 C.P.C. (7th) 232, at paras [7] 2015 ONCA 249, 126 O.R. (3d) 101, at paras 24, 26, 28, and 37-38. [8] strength of one may compensate for the weakness of another.  Generally, the court must dec......
2 firm's commentaries

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT