Canada v. Galbraith, [2001] B.C.T.C. 675 (SC)
| Judge | R.D. Wilson, J. |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Case Date | November 06, 2000 |
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Citations | [2001] B.C.T.C. 675 (SC);2001 BCSC 675 |
Can. v. Galbraith, [2001] B.C.T.C. 675 (SC)
MLB headnote and full text
Temp. Cite: [2002] B.C.T.C. TBEd. JL.050
Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada (respondent) v. Kirk Marshall Galbraith (applicant)
(62856; 2001 BCSC 675)
Indexed As: Canada v. Galbraith
British Columbia Supreme Court
Kamloops
R.D. Wilson, J.
May 7, 2001.
Summary:
This headnote contains no summary.
Criminal Law - Topic 7468
Summary conviction proceedings - Appeals - General - Extension of time for appealing - See paragraphs 1 to 40.
Income Tax - Topic 9344
Enforcement - Offences - Appeals - See paragraphs 1 to 40.
Cases Noticed:
R. v. Whitmore and Carmichael (1987), 41 C.C.C.(3d) 555 (Ont. H.C.), refd to. [para. 21].
Reference Re Section 94(2) of the Motor Vehicle Act (B.C.), [1985] 2 S.C.R. 486; 63 N.R. 266; [1986] 1 W.W.R. 481; 23 C.C.C.(3d) 289; 48 C.R.(3d) 289; 24 D.L.R.(4th) 536; 36 M.V.R. 240; 69 B.C.L.R.(2d) 145; 18 C.R.R. 30, refd to. [para. 22, footnote 2].
R. v. Jean Talon Fashion Centre Inc. (1975), 22 C.C.C.(2d) 223 (Que. Q.B.), refd to. [para. 22, footnote 2].
Casey v. Automobiles Renault Canada Ltd., [1965] S.C.R. 607; [1966] 2 C.C.C. 289, refd to. [para. 22, footnote 2].
R. v. Brown (1975), 28 C.C.C.(2d) 398 (Ont. P.C.), refd to. [para. 22, footnote 2].
R. v. Peavoy, [1974] O.J. No. 103 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 22, footnote 2].
R. v. Tait (1950), 98 C.C.C. 241 (B.C.C.A.), refd to. [para. 22, footnote 2].
R. v. Pilcher and Broadberry (1981), 58 C.C.C.(2d) 435 (Man. Prov. Ct.), refd to. [para. 22, footnote 2].
Blythe and R., Re (1973), 13 C.C.C.(2d) 192 (B.C.S.C.), refd to. [para. 22, footnote 2].
Swan and Tavrydas and R., Re; Ex parte Syme (1979), 48 C.C.C.(2d) 501 (Ont. H.C.), refd to. [para. 22, footnote 2].
R. v. Allen (1974), 20 C.C.C.(2d) 447 (Ont. C.A.), refd to. [para. 22, footnote 2].
Cohen and Quebec (Attorney General), Re (1976), 32 C.C.C.(2d) 446 (Que. C.A.), refd to. [para. 22, footnote 2].
R. v. Doyle, [1977] 1 S.C.R. 597; 9 N.R. 285; 10 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 45; 17 A.P.R. 45; 29 C.C.C.(2d) 177, refd to. [para. 22, footnote 2].
R. v. Darlyn (1946), 88 C.C.C. 269 (B.C.C.A.), refd to. [para. 31, footnote 3].
R. v. Brouillard, [1985] 1 S.C.R. 39; 57 N.R. 168, refd to. [para. 31, footnote 3].
R. v. Swyryda (1981), 11 Sask.R. 188 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 34].
Kennedy v. Canada Customs and Revenue Agency, [2000] O.J. No. 3313 (Sup. Ct.), refd to. [para. 37].
Statutes Noticed:
Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46, sect. 507 [para. 9, footnote 1]; sect. 788(1) [para. 14]; sect. 789(1) [para. 15].
Income Tax Act, R.S.C. 1985 (5th Supp.), c. 1, sect. 238(1) [para. 12].
Counsel:
S.A. Besanger, for the respondent;
Dave Lindsay, for the applicant.
This application was heard on November 6, 2000, with written submissions received on November 24, 2000, February 16, 2001 and March 9, 2001, before R.D. Wilson, J., of the British Columbia Supreme Court, who delivered the following decision on May 7, 2001.
Please note: The following judgment has not been edited.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Meads v. Meads,
...v. Maleki, [2007] 1 C.T.C. 212 ; 2006 ONCJ 401 , refd to. [para. 104]. Canada v. Galbraith, [2001] B.C.T.C. 675 ; 54 W.C.B.(2d) 504 ; 2001 BCSC 675, refd to. [para. R. v. Main (J.) (2000), 259 A.R. 163 ; 2000 ABQB 56 , refd to. [para. 104]. Hill v. Hill (2008), 306 Sask.R. 259 ; 200......
-
Table of cases
...2 SCR 145, 55 AR 291, [1984] SCJ No 36 ............................. 18, 25, 46, 47, 48, 81, 102, 106, 125, 285 Canada v Galbraith, 2001 BCSC 675 .................................................................. 203 Canada v Gibbs (2014), 354 Nld & PEIR 146, [2014] NJ No 234 (Prov Ct) ..........
-
Table of cases
...& PEIR 146, [2014] NJ No 234 (Prov Ct) ................................................................. 126, 193 Canada v Galbraith, 2001 BCSC 675 .................................................................. 193 Casey v Automobiles Renault Canada Ltd, [1965] SCR 607, 54 DLR (2d) 600,......
-
Table of cases
...145, 55 A.R. 291, [1984] S.C.J. No. 36 ..................................................... 15, 19, 21, 39, 61, 77 Canada v. Galbraith, 2001 BCSC 675 ........................................................... 164 Casey v. Automobiles Renault Canada Ltd., [1965] S.C.R. 607, 54 D.L.R. (2d) ......
-
Meads v. Meads,
...v. Maleki, [2007] 1 C.T.C. 212 ; 2006 ONCJ 401 , refd to. [para. 104]. Canada v. Galbraith, [2001] B.C.T.C. 675 ; 54 W.C.B.(2d) 504 ; 2001 BCSC 675, refd to. [para. R. v. Main (J.) (2000), 259 A.R. 163 ; 2000 ABQB 56 , refd to. [para. 104]. Hill v. Hill (2008), 306 Sask.R. 259 ; 200......
-
R. v. Lindsay (D.K.), (2011) 302 B.C.A.C. 76 (CA)
...4 C.T.C. 186 (Sup. Ct.), refd to. [para. 22]. R. v. Galbraith - see Canada v. Galbraith. Canada v. Galbraith, [2001] B.C.T.C. 675 ; 2001 BCSC 675, refd to. [para. 22]. R. v. Dick, 2003 BCPC 13 , refd to. [para. 22]. Bruno v. Canada Customs and Revenue Agency - see R. v. Bruno (H.L.). R. ......
-
R. v. Lindsay (D.K.), [2010] B.C.T.C. Uned. 831 (SC)
...of any income tax owing under his returns. [32] Kennedy was applied by Mr. Justice R.D. Wilson of this Court in HMTQ v. Galbraith , 2001 BCSC 675. That was an application to extend time for filing of an appeal, following the applicant's conviction in the Provincial Court for offences under ......
-
R. v. Crischuk (K.-C.) et al., [2010] B.C.T.C. Uned. 716
...Crischuk satisfies that definition. Moreover, if authority for this proposition is necessary, it can be found in Canada v. Galbraith , 2001 BCSC 675. Wilson, J., rejected the very argument Mr. Crischuk now advances at paragraphs 35 to 37, noting in the process that a similar argument had be......
-
Table of cases
...2 SCR 145, 55 AR 291, [1984] SCJ No 36 ............................. 18, 25, 46, 47, 48, 81, 102, 106, 125, 285 Canada v Galbraith, 2001 BCSC 675 .................................................................. 203 Canada v Gibbs (2014), 354 Nld & PEIR 146, [2014] NJ No 234 (Prov Ct) ..........
-
Table of cases
...& PEIR 146, [2014] NJ No 234 (Prov Ct) ................................................................. 126, 193 Canada v Galbraith, 2001 BCSC 675 .................................................................. 193 Casey v Automobiles Renault Canada Ltd, [1965] SCR 607, 54 DLR (2d) 600,......
-
Table of cases
...145, 55 A.R. 291, [1984] S.C.J. No. 36 ..................................................... 15, 19, 21, 39, 61, 77 Canada v. Galbraith, 2001 BCSC 675 ........................................................... 164 Casey v. Automobiles Renault Canada Ltd., [1965] S.C.R. 607, 54 D.L.R. (2d) ......
-
Arrest and Compelling Appearance
...the informant: see s. 723 of the Criminal Code and R. v. Sweeney (1912), 19 C.C.C. 222 (N.S.S.C. in banco). See also Canada v Galbraith , 2001 BCSC 675; R v Gibbs , [2006] 3 CTC 223 (BCSC). Note as well that in the case of private prosecutions, the hearing of witnesses is mandatory: see the......