Canada v. Galbraith
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Judge | R.D. Wilson, J. |
| Citation | [2001] B.C.T.C. 675 (SC),2001 BCSC 675 |
| Date | 06 November 2000 |
Can. v. Galbraith, [2001] B.C.T.C. 675 (SC)
MLB headnote and full text
Temp. Cite: [2002] B.C.T.C. TBEd. JL.050
Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada (respondent) v. Kirk Marshall Galbraith (applicant)
(62856; 2001 BCSC 675)
Indexed As: Canada v. Galbraith
British Columbia Supreme Court
Kamloops
R.D. Wilson, J.
May 7, 2001.
Summary:
This headnote contains no summary.
Criminal Law - Topic 7468
Summary conviction proceedings - Appeals - General - Extension of time for appealing - See paragraphs 1 to 40.
Income Tax - Topic 9344
Enforcement - Offences - Appeals - See paragraphs 1 to 40.
Cases Noticed:
R. v. Whitmore and Carmichael (1987), 41 C.C.C.(3d) 555 (Ont. H.C.), refd to. [para. 21].
Reference Re Section 94(2) of the Motor Vehicle Act (B.C.), [1985] 2 S.C.R. 486; 63 N.R. 266; [1986] 1 W.W.R. 481; 23 C.C.C.(3d) 289; 48 C.R.(3d) 289; 24 D.L.R.(4th) 536; 36 M.V.R. 240; 69 B.C.L.R.(2d) 145; 18 C.R.R. 30, refd to. [para. 22, footnote 2].
R. v. Jean Talon Fashion Centre Inc. (1975), 22 C.C.C.(2d) 223 (Que. Q.B.), refd to. [para. 22, footnote 2].
Casey v. Automobiles Renault Canada Ltd., [1965] S.C.R. 607; [1966] 2 C.C.C. 289, refd to. [para. 22, footnote 2].
R. v. Brown (1975), 28 C.C.C.(2d) 398 (Ont. P.C.), refd to. [para. 22, footnote 2].
R. v. Peavoy, [1974] O.J. No. 103 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 22, footnote 2].
R. v. Tait (1950), 98 C.C.C. 241 (B.C.C.A.), refd to. [para. 22, footnote 2].
R. v. Pilcher and Broadberry (1981), 58 C.C.C.(2d) 435 (Man. Prov. Ct.), refd to. [para. 22, footnote 2].
Blythe and R., Re (1973), 13 C.C.C.(2d) 192 (B.C.S.C.), refd to. [para. 22, footnote 2].
Swan and Tavrydas and R., Re; Ex parte Syme (1979), 48 C.C.C.(2d) 501 (Ont. H.C.), refd to. [para. 22, footnote 2].
R. v. Allen (1974), 20 C.C.C.(2d) 447 (Ont. C.A.), refd to. [para. 22, footnote 2].
Cohen and Quebec (Attorney General), Re (1976), 32 C.C.C.(2d) 446 (Que. C.A.), refd to. [para. 22, footnote 2].
R. v. Doyle, [1977] 1 S.C.R. 597; 9 N.R. 285; 10 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 45; 17 A.P.R. 45; 29 C.C.C.(2d) 177, refd to. [para. 22, footnote 2].
R. v. Darlyn (1946), 88 C.C.C. 269 (B.C.C.A.), refd to. [para. 31, footnote 3].
R. v. Brouillard, [1985] 1 S.C.R. 39; 57 N.R. 168, refd to. [para. 31, footnote 3].
R. v. Swyryda (1981), 11 Sask.R. 188 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 34].
Kennedy v. Canada Customs and Revenue Agency, [2000] O.J. No. 3313 (Sup. Ct.), refd to. [para. 37].
Statutes Noticed:
Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46, sect. 507 [para. 9, footnote 1]; sect. 788(1) [para. 14]; sect. 789(1) [para. 15].
Income Tax Act, R.S.C. 1985 (5th Supp.), c. 1, sect. 238(1) [para. 12].
Counsel:
S.A. Besanger, for the respondent;
Dave Lindsay, for the applicant.
This application was heard on November 6, 2000, with written submissions received on November 24, 2000, February 16, 2001 and March 9, 2001, before R.D. Wilson, J., of the British Columbia Supreme Court, who delivered the following decision on May 7, 2001.
Please note: The following judgment has not been edited.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Meads v. Meads
...v. Maleki, [2007] 1 C.T.C. 212 ; 2006 ONCJ 401 , refd to. [para. 104]. Canada v. Galbraith, [2001] B.C.T.C. 675 ; 54 W.C.B.(2d) 504 ; 2001 BCSC 675, refd to. [para. R. v. Main (J.) (2000), 259 A.R. 163 ; 2000 ABQB 56 , refd to. [para. 104]. Hill v. Hill (2008), 306 Sask.R. 259 ; 200......
-
Table of cases
...& PEIR 146, [2014] NJ No 234 (Prov Ct) ................................................................. 126, 193 Canada v Galbraith, 2001 BCSC 675 .................................................................. 193 Casey v Automobiles Renault Canada Ltd, [1965] SCR 607, 54 DLR (2d) 600,......
-
Table of cases
...145, 55 A.R. 291, [1984] S.C.J. No. 36 ..................................................... 15, 19, 21, 39, 61, 77 Canada v. Galbraith, 2001 BCSC 675 ........................................................... 164 Casey v. Automobiles Renault Canada Ltd., [1965] S.C.R. 607, 54 D.L.R. (2d) ......
-
Table of cases
...2 SCR 145, 55 AR 291, [1984] SCJ No 36 ............................. 18, 25, 46, 47, 48, 81, 102, 106, 125, 285 Canada v Galbraith, 2001 BCSC 675 .................................................................. 203 Canada v Gibbs (2014), 354 Nld & PEIR 146, [2014] NJ No 234 (Prov Ct) ..........
-
Meads v. Meads
...v. Maleki, [2007] 1 C.T.C. 212 ; 2006 ONCJ 401 , refd to. [para. 104]. Canada v. Galbraith, [2001] B.C.T.C. 675 ; 54 W.C.B.(2d) 504 ; 2001 BCSC 675, refd to. [para. R. v. Main (J.) (2000), 259 A.R. 163 ; 2000 ABQB 56 , refd to. [para. 104]. Hill v. Hill (2008), 306 Sask.R. 259 ; 200......
-
R. v. Lindsay (D.K.), (2011) 302 B.C.A.C. 76 (CA)
...4 C.T.C. 186 (Sup. Ct.), refd to. [para. 22]. R. v. Galbraith - see Canada v. Galbraith. Canada v. Galbraith, [2001] B.C.T.C. 675; 2001 BCSC 675, refd to. [para. 22]. R. v. Dick, 2003 BCPC 13 , refd to. [para. 22]. Bruno v. Canada Customs and Revenue Agency - see R. v. Bruno (H.L.). R. v.......
-
R. v. Ciciarelli
...2007 FCC 139; Cudmore v. Canada, 2010 FCC 318, [2010] C.T.C. 2271; Kion v. Canada, 2009 TCC 447, 2009 D.T.C. 447; Canada v. Galbraith, 2001 BCSC 675, [2001] B.C.T.C. 675. Litigants who advance this type of argument have been referred to as “Organized Pseudolegal Commercial Argument litigant......
-
R. v. Lindsay (D.K.)
...of any income tax owing under his returns. [32] Kennedy was applied by Mr. Justice R.D. Wilson of this Court in HMTQ v. Galbraith , 2001 BCSC 675. That was an application to extend time for filing of an appeal, following the applicant's conviction in the Provincial Court for offences under ......
-
Table of cases
...& PEIR 146, [2014] NJ No 234 (Prov Ct) ................................................................. 126, 193 Canada v Galbraith, 2001 BCSC 675 .................................................................. 193 Casey v Automobiles Renault Canada Ltd, [1965] SCR 607, 54 DLR (2d) 600,......
-
Table of cases
...145, 55 A.R. 291, [1984] S.C.J. No. 36 ..................................................... 15, 19, 21, 39, 61, 77 Canada v. Galbraith, 2001 BCSC 675 ........................................................... 164 Casey v. Automobiles Renault Canada Ltd., [1965] S.C.R. 607, 54 D.L.R. (2d) ......
-
Table of cases
...2 SCR 145, 55 AR 291, [1984] SCJ No 36 ............................. 18, 25, 46, 47, 48, 81, 102, 106, 125, 285 Canada v Galbraith, 2001 BCSC 675 .................................................................. 203 Canada v Gibbs (2014), 354 Nld & PEIR 146, [2014] NJ No 234 (Prov Ct) ..........
-
Arrest and Compelling Appearance
...the informant: see s. 723 of the Criminal Code and R. v. Sweeney (1912), 19 C.C.C. 222 (N.S.S.C. in banco). See also Canada v Galbraith , 2001 BCSC 675; R v Gibbs , [2006] 3 CTC 223 (BCSC). Note as well that in the case of private prosecutions, the hearing of witnesses is mandatory: see the......