Canada (Board of Internal Economy) v. Canada (Attorney General), 2017 FCA 43
| Court | Federal Court of Appeal (Canada) |
| Case Date | March 07, 2017 |
| Jurisdiction | Canada (Federal) |
| Citations | 2017 FCA 43 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
26 practice notes
-
International Air Transport Association v. Canadian Transportation Agency, 2022 FCA 211
...conclusions and will not need expert opinions. As this Court stated in Canada (Board of Internal Economy) v. Canada (Attorney General), 2017 FCA 43 (at para. 18) [Board of Internal Economy], “[t]his is precisely why questions of domestic law (as opposed to foreign law) are not matters upon ......
-
Brown c. Canada (Citoyenneté et Immigration),
...v. Ontario (Attorney General), [1990] 2 S.C.R. 1086, 73 D.L.R. (4th) 686; Canada (Board of Internal Economy) v. Canada (Attorney General), 2017 FCA 43, 412 D.L.R. (4th) 336; White Burgess Langille Inman v. Abbott and Haliburton Co., 2015 SCC 23, [2015] 2 S.C.R. 182; Little Sisters Book and ......
-
Johnston v. Okanagan First Nation, 2022 FC 1237
...of justice to do so, such as where a party would be materially prejudiced (Canada (Board of Internal Economy) v Canada (Attorney General), 2017 FCA 43 at para 29). [91] For the reasons above I am not persuaded that the Johnston Affidavit is abusive or that it is clearly or “obviously......
-
VIIV HEALTHCARE CO. V. GILEAD SCIENCES CANADA, INC.,
...way. Inherent in Rule 3 is the concept of proportionality: Canada (Board of Internal Economy) v. Canada (Attorney General), 2017 FCA 43, 412 D.L.R. (4th) 336 at para. 11. The words “every”, “most” and “least” in Rule 3 deserve particular attention. ......
Request a trial to view additional results
24 cases
-
International Air Transport Association v. Canadian Transportation Agency, 2022 FCA 211
...conclusions and will not need expert opinions. As this Court stated in Canada (Board of Internal Economy) v. Canada (Attorney General), 2017 FCA 43 (at para. 18) [Board of Internal Economy], “[t]his is precisely why questions of domestic law (as opposed to foreign law) are not matters upon ......
-
Brown c. Canada (Citoyenneté et Immigration),
...v. Ontario (Attorney General), [1990] 2 S.C.R. 1086, 73 D.L.R. (4th) 686; Canada (Board of Internal Economy) v. Canada (Attorney General), 2017 FCA 43, 412 D.L.R. (4th) 336; White Burgess Langille Inman v. Abbott and Haliburton Co., 2015 SCC 23, [2015] 2 S.C.R. 182; Little Sisters Book and ......
-
Johnston v. Okanagan First Nation, 2022 FC 1237
...of justice to do so, such as where a party would be materially prejudiced (Canada (Board of Internal Economy) v Canada (Attorney General), 2017 FCA 43 at para 29). [91] For the reasons above I am not persuaded that the Johnston Affidavit is abusive or that it is clearly or “obviously......
-
VIIV HEALTHCARE CO. V. GILEAD SCIENCES CANADA, INC.,
...way. Inherent in Rule 3 is the concept of proportionality: Canada (Board of Internal Economy) v. Canada (Attorney General), 2017 FCA 43, 412 D.L.R. (4th) 336 at para. 11. The words “every”, “most” and “least” in Rule 3 deserve particular attention. ......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
-
When Will Expert Evidence Be Excluded?
...Court of Appeal relating to use of funds by a federal political party: Canada (Board of Internal Economy) v. Canada (Attorney General), 2017 FCA 43. In that case, the evidence of a law professor on the issue of comparative constitutional law was also held to be inadmissible on a pre-hearing......
-
When Will Expert Evidence Be Excluded?
...Court of Appeal relating to use of funds by a federal political party: Canada (Board of Internal Economy) v. Canada (Attorney General), 2017 FCA 43. In that case, the evidence of a law professor on the issue of comparative constitutional law was also held to be inadmissible on a pre-hearing......