Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v. Li, 2017 FC 805
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | ADMINISTRATIVE LAW,CRIMINAL LAW,IMMIGRATION AND REFUGEE |
| Citation | 2017 FC 805 |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Date | 06 September 2017 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 practice notes
-
Yang v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2022 FC 329
...and, the degree of hardship that would be caused to the applicant by removal from Canada (Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v Li, 2017 FC 805 at paras 21–22). IX. The IAD’s Decision Is Reasonable [53] The IAD’s decision bears all the hallmarks of reasonableness. The ......
-
Yang v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2019 FC 1236
...its discretionary jurisdiction for misrepresentation are specific to the individual (see also Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v Li, 2017 FC 805 at paras 21-22). The relevant factors include the seriousness of the misrepresentation, degree of remorse, length of time and establishment in......
-
Li v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2019 FC 1235
...community; and degree of hardship that would be caused to the applicant by removal from Canada (Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v Li, 2017 FC 805 at paras 21-22). These factors are non-exhaustive, and the weight accorded to each varies with the circumstances (Wang v Canada (Public Safe......
-
Sun v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 477
...(Thavarasa v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FC 625 (CanLII) at paras 18-22; Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v Li, 2017 FC 805 (CanLII) at paras 31-32). The Respondent submits that immigration officials may have had further questions for the Applicant at the time that he bec......
Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
-
Yang v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2022 FC 329
...and, the degree of hardship that would be caused to the applicant by removal from Canada (Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v Li, 2017 FC 805 at paras 21–22). IX. The IAD’s Decision Is Reasonable [53] The IAD’s decision bears all the hallmarks of reasonableness. The ......
-
Yang v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2019 FC 1236
...its discretionary jurisdiction for misrepresentation are specific to the individual (see also Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v Li, 2017 FC 805 at paras 21-22). The relevant factors include the seriousness of the misrepresentation, degree of remorse, length of time and establishment in......
-
Li v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2019 FC 1235
...community; and degree of hardship that would be caused to the applicant by removal from Canada (Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v Li, 2017 FC 805 at paras 21-22). These factors are non-exhaustive, and the weight accorded to each varies with the circumstances (Wang v Canada (Public Safe......
-
Sun v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 477
...(Thavarasa v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FC 625 (CanLII) at paras 18-22; Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v Li, 2017 FC 805 (CanLII) at paras 31-32). The Respondent submits that immigration officials may have had further questions for the Applicant at the time that he bec......
Request a trial to view additional results