Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v. Adeola, 2018 FC 1222

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
Citation2018 FC 1222
CourtFederal Court (Canada)
Date05 December 2018
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 practice notes
  • Sharanek v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2019 FC 751
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Federal Court (Canada)
    • May 28, 2019
    ...and intelligible: see the discussion of the principles regarding sufficiency of reasons in Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v Adeola, 2018 FC 1222 at paras 32-34. I further find the reasoning in the decision to be consistent with the governing jurisprudence, as noted above. I therefore ......
  • Francois v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 748
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Federal Court (Canada)
    • May 28, 2019
    ...Delta Airlines Inc v Lukacs, 2018 SCC 2. For a useful summary of the recent principles, see Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v Adeola, 2018 FC 1222 at paras. 32-34. It is not necessary to review this in more detail, since I find that this case turns on specific errors which relate to a ......
2 cases
  • Francois v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 748
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Federal Court (Canada)
    • May 28, 2019
    ...Delta Airlines Inc v Lukacs, 2018 SCC 2. For a useful summary of the recent principles, see Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v Adeola, 2018 FC 1222 at paras. 32-34. It is not necessary to review this in more detail, since I find that this case turns on specific errors which relate to a ......
  • Sharanek v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2019 FC 751
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Federal Court (Canada)
    • May 28, 2019
    ...and intelligible: see the discussion of the principles regarding sufficiency of reasons in Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v Adeola, 2018 FC 1222 at paras 32-34. I further find the reasoning in the decision to be consistent with the governing jurisprudence, as noted above. I therefore ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT