Canada (National Revenue) v. Friedman, 2019 FC 1583
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Citation | 2019 FC 1583 |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Date | 10 December 2019 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 practice notes
-
Canada (National Revenue) v. Zeifmans LLP, 2023 FC 1000
...commence a compliance proceeding while an application for judicial review is pending: Canada (Minister of National Revenue) v Friedman, 2019 FC 1583. iii. the availability of an [72] The Minister submits this factor, as refined in Bird, is an important Maybrun factor for the present applica......
-
Canada (National Revenue) v. Ghermezian, 2022 FC 236
...corporation, to whom certain Demands were directed. [174] As is evident from the recent decision in Canada (National Revenue) v Friedman, 2019 FC 1583 (affirmed 2021 FCA 101), in which Justice Pamel declined to follow Lin notwithstanding very similar facts, the analysis required to consider......
-
Friedman v. Canada (National Revenue),
...an application by the Minister for an order requiring each of the Friedmans to comply with the request. [2] In a decision reported as 2019 FC 1583 (the Decision), the Federal Court dismissed the Friedmans’ applications for judicial review and made the orders requested by the Minister......
-
Hughes v. Canada (Human Rights Commission), 2020 FC 1096
...consistent with the contents of Rules 76-79: see Janssen Inc. v. AbbVie Corporation, 2014 FCA 242; Canada (National Revenue) v. Friedman, 2019 FC 1583 (Pamel J.), at para 19; Boakye v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 831 (Southcott J.), at paras 17 and 19. [42] The broad ......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
-
Canada (National Revenue) v. Zeifmans LLP, 2023 FC 1000
...commence a compliance proceeding while an application for judicial review is pending: Canada (Minister of National Revenue) v Friedman, 2019 FC 1583. iii. the availability of an [72] The Minister submits this factor, as refined in Bird, is an important Maybrun factor for the present applica......
-
Canada (National Revenue) v. Ghermezian, 2022 FC 236
...corporation, to whom certain Demands were directed. [174] As is evident from the recent decision in Canada (National Revenue) v Friedman, 2019 FC 1583 (affirmed 2021 FCA 101), in which Justice Pamel declined to follow Lin notwithstanding very similar facts, the analysis required to consider......
-
Friedman v. Canada (National Revenue),
...an application by the Minister for an order requiring each of the Friedmans to comply with the request. [2] In a decision reported as 2019 FC 1583 (the Decision), the Federal Court dismissed the Friedmans’ applications for judicial review and made the orders requested by the Minister......
-
Hughes v. Canada (Human Rights Commission), 2020 FC 1096
...consistent with the contents of Rules 76-79: see Janssen Inc. v. AbbVie Corporation, 2014 FCA 242; Canada (National Revenue) v. Friedman, 2019 FC 1583 (Pamel J.), at para 19; Boakye v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 831 (Southcott J.), at paras 17 and 19. [42] The broad ......
Request a trial to view additional results