Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness) v. Lunyamila, 2018 FC 211
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Citation | 2018 FC 211 |
| Date | 23 February 2018 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
Allen v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2018 FC 486
...cooperation weighed heavily against him citing Canada (MPSEP) v Lunyamila, 2016 FC 1199 [Lunyamila 2016] and Canada (MPSEP) v Lunyamila, 2018 FC 211. III. [17] On this application, the Applicant has not challenged the reasonableness of the ID’s findings on his continued detention. Rather, h......
-
Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness) v. Thomas,
...an individual involved in serious criminality, such as Lunyamila II; Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness) v Lunyamila, 2018 FC 211 (LeBlanc J.) (“Lunyamila IV”); and Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness) v Ali, 2018 552 (Crampton CJ). [48] At stage one......
-
Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness) v. Hamdan, 2019 FC 1129
...Ultimately, the conditions must be responsive to the identified risk. In Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness) v Lunyamila, 2018 FC 211 at para 97, Justice Leblanc felt that the Board had not done so because the danger and flight risk were not adequately addressed by the extent ......
3 cases
-
Allen v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2018 FC 486
...cooperation weighed heavily against him citing Canada (MPSEP) v Lunyamila, 2016 FC 1199 [Lunyamila 2016] and Canada (MPSEP) v Lunyamila, 2018 FC 211. III. [17] On this application, the Applicant has not challenged the reasonableness of the ID’s findings on his continued detention. Rather, h......
-
Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness) v. Thomas,
...an individual involved in serious criminality, such as Lunyamila II; Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness) v Lunyamila, 2018 FC 211 (LeBlanc J.) (“Lunyamila IV”); and Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness) v Ali, 2018 552 (Crampton CJ). [48] At stage one......
-
Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness) v. Hamdan, 2019 FC 1129
...Ultimately, the conditions must be responsive to the identified risk. In Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness) v Lunyamila, 2018 FC 211 at para 97, Justice Leblanc felt that the Board had not done so because the danger and flight risk were not adequately addressed by the extent ......