Canada v. Kattenburg, 2020 FCA 164
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Canada) |
| Citation | 2020 FCA 164 |
| Date | 06 October 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
18 practice notes
-
Canada v. Boloh 1(a), 2023 FCA 120
...on a buffet table from which we can take whatever we like and eat whatever we please”: Canada (Attorney General) v. Kattenburg, 2020 FCA 164 at para. 26. As well, different sources of international law have different value in the interpretive process: see generally 9147-0732 Qué......
-
Fazel v Singer (Wilson Laycraft),
...the applicant’s position because the ultimate decision is what justice requires: compare Canada (Attorney General) v Kattenburg, 2020 FCA 164 at para 9(3), [2020] FCJ No. 965 (QL) leave denied [2020] SCCA No. 460 (QL) (SCC 39474); R v P(C), 2021 SCC 19 at para 137, 457 DLR (4th) Prej......
-
Canada (Attorney General) v. Stevan Utah, 2020 FCA 224
...at para. 121 (in the context of administrative decision-makers but equally applicable to judges); Canada (Attorney General) v. Kattenburg, 2020 FCA 164 at paras. 24-26. Judges are only unelected lawyers who happen to hold a judicial commission. They have no right to smuggle into the task of......
-
Jamali v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1328
...in it containing a hyperlink to the updated document. I observe that this is not proper evidence: Canada (Attorney General) v. Kattenburg, 2020 FCA 164, at para 32; see also Rule 82 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 and Bell Helicopter Textron Canada Limitée v. Eurocopter, 2013 ......
Request a trial to view additional results
21 cases
-
Canada v. Boloh 1(a), 2023 FCA 120
...on a buffet table from which we can take whatever we like and eat whatever we please”: Canada (Attorney General) v. Kattenburg, 2020 FCA 164 at para. 26. As well, different sources of international law have different value in the interpretive process: see generally 9147-0732 Qué......
-
Fazel v Singer (Wilson Laycraft),
...the applicant’s position because the ultimate decision is what justice requires: compare Canada (Attorney General) v Kattenburg, 2020 FCA 164 at para 9(3), [2020] FCJ No. 965 (QL) leave denied [2020] SCCA No. 460 (QL) (SCC 39474); R v P(C), 2021 SCC 19 at para 137, 457 DLR (4th) Prej......
-
Canada (Attorney General) v. Stevan Utah, 2020 FCA 224
...at para. 121 (in the context of administrative decision-makers but equally applicable to judges); Canada (Attorney General) v. Kattenburg, 2020 FCA 164 at paras. 24-26. Judges are only unelected lawyers who happen to hold a judicial commission. They have no right to smuggle into the task of......
-
Hughes v. Canada (Human Rights Commission), 2020 FC 986
...Court cannot try to track them down as public documents, for example by looking on the Internet: Canada (Attorney General) v Kattenburg, 2020 FCA 164 (Stratas, JA), at para 32. Apart from being improper to do so, there would be no affidavit before the Court to identify the documents as the ......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Appellate Judge Addresses "Political Or Ideological" Intervention Motions (and Other Judges)
...recently addressed the role of interveners and, in doing so, the proper role of the courts. In Canada (Attorney General) v. Kattenburg, 2020 FCA 164, Justice Stratas dismissed multiple motions for leave to in an appeal from a judicial review decision. The underlying judicial review was narr......