Canada v. Loblaw Financial Holdings Inc.,

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
JudgeWagner, Richard; Moldaver, Michael J.; Karakatsanis, Andromache; Côté, Suzanne; Brown, Russell; Martin, Sheilah; Kasirer, Nicholas
Neutral Citation2021 SCC 51
Citation2021 SCC 51
Date03 December 2021
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
Docket Number39220
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
12 practice notes
  • Csak v. The King, 2024 TCC 9
    • Canada
    • Tax Court (Canada)
    • January 18, 2024
    ...26; see also R. v. J.D., 2022 SCC 15 , at para. 21). [144] In paragraphs 41 and 61 of Canada v. Loblaw Financial Holdings Inc., 2021 SCC 51, the Supreme Court of Canada elaborates on this approach in the income tax This narrow question of statutory interpretation requires us to d......
  • Independent Order of Foresters v. The King, 2023 TCC 123
    • Canada
    • Tax Court (Canada)
    • August 17, 2023
    ...liabilities. [35] ITA subsection 248(1). [36] ITR subsection 2400(1) definition of “Canadian reserve liabilities”. [37] 2021 SCC 51. [38] Ruth Sullivan, The Construction of Statutes, 7th ed. (Toronto: LexisNexis, 2022) at pages 345-346; Ruth Sullivan, Statutory Interpretation,......
  • Stackhouse v. The King, 2023 TCC 156
    • Canada
    • Tax Court (Canada)
    • November 8, 2023
    ...[the Court] to focus carefully on the text and context in assessing the broader purpose” (R. v. Loblaw Financial Holdings Inc., 2021 SCC 51 at paragraph [91] The text of subsection 31(1) is deceptively straightforward. The restriction on the deductibility of farm losses in subsection......
  • Google LLC v. Canada (Privacy Commissioner), 2023 FCA 200
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • September 29, 2023
    ...in vain, and that it would not have legislated an exemption whose terms could never be met: Canada v. Loblaw Financial Holdings Inc., 2021 SCC 51 at para. 64. I note again in this regard that the focus of paragraph 4(2)(c) is different from that of paragraph 4(1)(a): the inclusionary provis......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
11 cases
  • Csak v. The King, 2024 TCC 9
    • Canada
    • Tax Court (Canada)
    • January 18, 2024
    ...26; see also R. v. J.D., 2022 SCC 15 , at para. 21). [144] In paragraphs 41 and 61 of Canada v. Loblaw Financial Holdings Inc., 2021 SCC 51, the Supreme Court of Canada elaborates on this approach in the income tax This narrow question of statutory interpretation requires us to d......
  • Independent Order of Foresters v. The King, 2023 TCC 123
    • Canada
    • Tax Court (Canada)
    • August 17, 2023
    ...liabilities. [35] ITA subsection 248(1). [36] ITR subsection 2400(1) definition of “Canadian reserve liabilities”. [37] 2021 SCC 51. [38] Ruth Sullivan, The Construction of Statutes, 7th ed. (Toronto: LexisNexis, 2022) at pages 345-346; Ruth Sullivan, Statutory Interpretation,......
  • Google LLC v. Canada (Privacy Commissioner), 2023 FCA 200
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • September 29, 2023
    ...in vain, and that it would not have legislated an exemption whose terms could never be met: Canada v. Loblaw Financial Holdings Inc., 2021 SCC 51 at para. 64. I note again in this regard that the focus of paragraph 4(2)(c) is different from that of paragraph 4(1)(a): the inclusionary provis......
  • Stackhouse v. The King, 2023 TCC 156
    • Canada
    • Tax Court (Canada)
    • November 8, 2023
    ...[the Court] to focus carefully on the text and context in assessing the broader purpose” (R. v. Loblaw Financial Holdings Inc., 2021 SCC 51 at paragraph [91] The text of subsection 31(1) is deceptively straightforward. The restriction on the deductibility of farm losses in subsection......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT