Canadian National Railway Co. v. Royal and Sun Alliance Insurance Co. of Canada, 2008 SCC 66
Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
Judge | McLachlin, Beverley; Binnie, William Ian Corneil; LeBel, Louis; Deschamps, Marie; Abella, Rosalie Silberman; Charron, Louise; Rothstein, Marshall |
Citation | 2008 SCC 66,[2008] 3 SCR 453,68 CCLI (4th) 1,243 OAC 340,299 DLR (4th) 1,[2008] ACS no 67,[2008] SCJ No 67 (QL),381 NR 332,JE 2008-2205,EYB 2008-150740,170 ACWS (3d) 623,AZ-50521983 |
Date | 21 November 2008 |
Subject Matter | INSURANCE,TORTS |
Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
Docket Number | 32062 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
25 practice notes
-
Dunn v. Chubb Insurance Company of Canada,
... 36 W.A.C. 81 , refd to. [para. 35]. Canadian National Railway Co. et al. v. Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance Co. of Canada et al., [2008] 3 S.C.R. 453; 381 N.R. 332 ; 243 O.A.C. 340 ; 2008 SCC 66 , refd to. [para. 36]. Stevenson v. Reliance Petroleum Ltd., [1956] S.C.R. 936 , refd to......
-
Arora et al. v. Whirlpool Canada LP et al., 2013 ONCA 657
...399 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. 14]. Canadian National Railway Co. et al. v. Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance Co. of Canada et al., [2008] 3 S.C.R. 453; 381 N.R. 332; 243 O.A.C. 340; 2008 SCC 66, refd to. [para. Maher v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Co. of Canada Ltd. et al. (2010), 266 O.A......
-
MDS Inc. v. Factory Mutual Insurance Company, 2020 ONSC 1924
...41 (U.K. H.L.), at pp. 46-47. See also Canadian National Railway Co. v. Royal and Sun Alliance Insurance Co. of Canada, 2008 SCC 66, [2008] 3 S.C.R. 453, at para. 79 (Binnie J., dissenting but not on this point); Sanofi Pasteur Ltd. v. UPS SCS, Inc., 2015 ONCA 88, at paras. 27-28; Craig Bro......
-
DirectCash ATM Management Partnership et al. v. Maurice's Gas & Convenience Inc. et al., 2015 NBCA 36
...6; 2014 SCC 71, refd to. [para. 22]. Canadian National Railway Co. et al. v. Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance Co. of Canada et al., [2008] 3 S.C.R. 453; 381 N.R. 332; 243 O.A.C. 340; 2008 SCC 66, refd to. [para. 23]. McClelland and Stewart Ltd. v. Mutual Life Assurance Co. of Canada, [198......
Request a trial to view additional results
24 cases
-
Dunn v. Chubb Insurance Company of Canada,
... 36 W.A.C. 81 , refd to. [para. 35]. Canadian National Railway Co. et al. v. Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance Co. of Canada et al., [2008] 3 S.C.R. 453; 381 N.R. 332 ; 243 O.A.C. 340 ; 2008 SCC 66 , refd to. [para. 36]. Stevenson v. Reliance Petroleum Ltd., [1956] S.C.R. 936 , refd to......
-
Arora et al. v. Whirlpool Canada LP et al., 2013 ONCA 657
...399 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. 14]. Canadian National Railway Co. et al. v. Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance Co. of Canada et al., [2008] 3 S.C.R. 453; 381 N.R. 332; 243 O.A.C. 340; 2008 SCC 66, refd to. [para. Maher v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Co. of Canada Ltd. et al. (2010), 266 O.A......
-
MDS Inc. v. Factory Mutual Insurance Company, 2020 ONSC 1924
...41 (U.K. H.L.), at pp. 46-47. See also Canadian National Railway Co. v. Royal and Sun Alliance Insurance Co. of Canada, 2008 SCC 66, [2008] 3 S.C.R. 453, at para. 79 (Binnie J., dissenting but not on this point); Sanofi Pasteur Ltd. v. UPS SCS, Inc., 2015 ONCA 88, at paras. 27-28; Craig Bro......
-
Economical Mutual Insurance Co. v. Lapalme, 2010 NBCA 87
...1; 2010 SCC 33, refd to. [para. 28]. Canadian National Railway Co. et al. v. Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance Co. of Canada et al., [2008] 3 S.C.R. 453; 381 N.R. 332; 243 O.A.C. 340; 2008 SCC 66, refd to. [para. 28]. Non-Marine Underwriters, Lloyd's of London v. Scalera - see Scalera v. L......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
On-Risk E-Bulletin @ Gowlings: March 27, 2009
...The Supreme Court of Canada The decision of the Supreme Court of Canada can be read at http://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2008/2008scc66/2008scc66.html. In a narrow majority (4-3), the Supreme Court of Canada CNR's appeal and restored the award of the trial judge. The Insurers' argument wa......