Canadian Pacific Railway Company v. Canada (Attorney General)

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
CourtCourt of Appeal (Canada)
Citation2018 FCA 69
Date06 April 2018

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
1721 practice notes
  • The Federal Courts and Administrative Law
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Federal Court of Appeal and the Federal Court. 50 Years of History
    • October 4, 2021
    ...System Limited v Canadian Media Guild , 2014 FCA 59, Stratus J concurring; Canadian Paciic Railway Company v Canada (Attorney General) , 2018 FCA 69 at paras 33–56, Rennie J. 174 Paradis Honey Ltd v Canada , 2015 FCA 89, leave to appeal to the SCC refused (36471, 29 October 2015). 175 See K......
  • Kreishan v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • August 19, 2019
    ...correctness applies to the fairness of the procedure of the RPD hearing (Canadian Pacific Railway Company v. Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FCA 69). Adverse findings of fact and conclusions or inferences with respect to credibility must find their justification in the evidence before the R......
  • Bellegarde v. Carry the Kettle First Nation
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • May 7, 2024
    ...intervene” (see also Mission Institution v Khela, 2014 SCC 24 at para 79; Canadian Pacific Railway Company v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FCA 69 at paras 33–34, 54 [Canadian Pacific]; Canadian Hardwood Plywood and Veneer Association v Canada (Attorney General), 2023 FCA 74 at para 57). A......
  • KNAPP and ATHERTON v. ICR COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE and OFFICE OF RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • February 26, 2019
    ...Respecting issues of procedural fairness, the Federal Court of Appeal in Canadian Pacific Railway Company v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FCA 69, [Canadian Pacific Railway] had this to say about characterizing such issues as questions of law. Writing for the court, Rennie J.A. stated: [46......
  • Get Started for Free
1582 cases
  • McNeil v. WCAT (PEI)
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Prince Edward Island)
    • May 19, 2021
    ...entitled.   Authorities Cited:   CASES CONSIDERED:  Canadian Pacific Railway Company v. Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FCA 69; Baker v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [1999] 2 SCR STATUTES CONSIDERED:  Workers Compensation Act, R.S.P.E.I. 1988, W-7.1.......
  • KNAPP and ATHERTON v. ICR COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE and OFFICE OF RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • February 26, 2019
    ...Respecting issues of procedural fairness, the Federal Court of Appeal in Canadian Pacific Railway Company v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FCA 69, [Canadian Pacific Railway] had this to say about characterizing such issues as questions of law. Writing for the court, Rennie J.A. stated: [46......
  • HP Consultants Inc. v. IIDI
    • Canada
    • Alberta Court of Justice
    • June 23, 2025
    ...v. New Brunswick, 2008 SCC 9; Mission Institution v. Khela, 2014 SCC 24; Canadian Pacific Railway Company v. Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FCA 69; C.U.P.E. v. Ontario (Minister of Labour), 2003 SCC 29; Murray Purcha & Son Ltd. v. Barriere (District), 2019 BCCA 4 Clements, C.J.:  ......
  • Abrametz v Law Society of Saskatchewan
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • July 3, 2020
    ...based on a breach of the duty of fairness raises a question of law. In Canadian Pacific Railway Company v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FCA 69 [CPR], the Federal Court of Appeal dealt with a statutory appeal based on an alleged breach of procedural fairness pursuant to s. 41 of the Canada......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • The Federal Courts and Administrative Law
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Federal Court of Appeal and the Federal Court. 50 Years of History
    • October 4, 2021
    ...System Limited v Canadian Media Guild , 2014 FCA 59, Stratus J concurring; Canadian Paciic Railway Company v Canada (Attorney General) , 2018 FCA 69 at paras 33–56, Rennie J. 174 Paradis Honey Ltd v Canada , 2015 FCA 89, leave to appeal to the SCC refused (36471, 29 October 2015). 175 See K......