Canadian Pacific Railway v. Canada, 2020 FC 690
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Citation | 2020 FC 690 |
| Date | 15 June 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
3 practice notes
-
Canadian Pacific Railway Company v. Canada, 2021 FC 1014
...respectively. Neither motion succeeded (see Canadian Pacific Railway Co v Canada, 2019 FC 1531 and Canadian Pacific Railway v Canada, 2020 FC 690). However, I also note that neither party opposed the experts’ qualifications prior to or at trial. [136] Indeed, I find that each exper......
-
Canadian Pacific Railway Company v. Canada, 2022 FC 392
...were necessary in two pre-trial motions (Canadian Pacific Railway Company v. Canada, 2019 FC 1531 ; Canadian Pacific Railway v. Canada, 2020 FC 690; Canadian Pacific Railway Company v. Canada, 2020 FC 1058 ). [71] Neither will I accept the Plaintiff’s invitation to dissect the dock......
-
Graca v. Carter, 2022 NSSC 107
...still arise although the underlying considerations and implications are obviously different. In Canadian Pacific Railway v Canada, 2020 FC 690, Diner, J provides a helpful summary of the various forms of prejudice associated with reply or rebuttal evidence (at paragraphs 20 – (......
3 cases
-
Canadian Pacific Railway Company v. Canada, 2021 FC 1014
...respectively. Neither motion succeeded (see Canadian Pacific Railway Co v Canada, 2019 FC 1531 and Canadian Pacific Railway v Canada, 2020 FC 690). However, I also note that neither party opposed the experts’ qualifications prior to or at trial. [136] Indeed, I find that each exper......
-
Canadian Pacific Railway Company v. Canada, 2022 FC 392
...were necessary in two pre-trial motions (Canadian Pacific Railway Company v. Canada, 2019 FC 1531 ; Canadian Pacific Railway v. Canada, 2020 FC 690; Canadian Pacific Railway Company v. Canada, 2020 FC 1058 ). [71] Neither will I accept the Plaintiff’s invitation to dissect the dock......
-
Graca v. Carter, 2022 NSSC 107
...still arise although the underlying considerations and implications are obviously different. In Canadian Pacific Railway v Canada, 2020 FC 690, Diner, J provides a helpful summary of the various forms of prejudice associated with reply or rebuttal evidence (at paragraphs 20 – (......