Canadian Pacific Railway v. Canada, 2020 FC 690
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Citation | 2020 FC 690 |
| Date | 15 June 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
Canadian Pacific Railway Company v. Canada,
...respectively. Neither motion succeeded (see Canadian Pacific Railway Co v Canada, 2019 FC 1531 and Canadian Pacific Railway v Canada, 2020 FC 690). However, I also note that neither party opposed the experts’ qualifications prior to or at trial. [136] Indeed, I find that each exper......
-
Canadian Pacific Railway Company v. Canada, 2022 FC 392
...were necessary in two pre-trial motions (Canadian Pacific Railway Company v. Canada, 2019 FC 1531 ; Canadian Pacific Railway v. Canada, 2020 FC 690; Canadian Pacific Railway Company v. Canada, 2020 FC 1058 ). [71] Neither will I accept the Plaintiff’s invitation to dissect the dock......
-
Graca v. Carter,
...still arise although the underlying considerations and implications are obviously different. In Canadian Pacific Railway v Canada, 2020 FC 690, Diner, J provides a helpful summary of the various forms of prejudice associated with reply or rebuttal evidence (at paragraphs 20 – (......
3 cases
-
Canadian Pacific Railway Company v. Canada,
...respectively. Neither motion succeeded (see Canadian Pacific Railway Co v Canada, 2019 FC 1531 and Canadian Pacific Railway v Canada, 2020 FC 690). However, I also note that neither party opposed the experts’ qualifications prior to or at trial. [136] Indeed, I find that each exper......
-
Canadian Pacific Railway Company v. Canada, 2022 FC 392
...were necessary in two pre-trial motions (Canadian Pacific Railway Company v. Canada, 2019 FC 1531 ; Canadian Pacific Railway v. Canada, 2020 FC 690; Canadian Pacific Railway Company v. Canada, 2020 FC 1058 ). [71] Neither will I accept the Plaintiff’s invitation to dissect the dock......
-
Graca v. Carter,
...still arise although the underlying considerations and implications are obviously different. In Canadian Pacific Railway v Canada, 2020 FC 690, Diner, J provides a helpful summary of the various forms of prejudice associated with reply or rebuttal evidence (at paragraphs 20 – (......