CanadianOxy Chemicals Ltd. et al. v. Canada (Attorney General) et al., (1998) 237 N.R. 373 (SCC)

JudgeCory, Iacobucci, Major and Binnie, JJ.
CourtSupreme Court of Canada
Case DateThursday December 10, 1998
JurisdictionCanada (Federal)
Citations(1998), 237 N.R. 373 (SCC);41 WCB (2d) 411;122 BCAC 1;1999 CanLII 680 (SCC);237 NR 373;133 CCC (3d) 426;171 DLR (4th) 733;23 CR (5th) 259;29 CELR (2d) 1;[1998] SCJ No 87 (QL);[1999] CarswellBC 777;[1999] 1 SCR 743;200 WAC 1;JE 99-861

CanadianOxy Chemicals v. Can. (A.G.) (1998), 237 N.R. 373 (SCC)

MLB Headnote and full text

[French language version follows English language version]

[La version française vient à la suite de la version anglaise]

....................

Temp. Cite: [1999] N.R. TBEd. AP.020

The Attorney General of Canada (appellant) v. CanadianOxy Chemicals Ltd., CanadianOxy Industrial Chemicals Limited Partnership and Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd. (respondents) and the Attorney General for Ontario (intervener)

(25944)

Indexed As: CanadianOxy Chemicals Ltd. et al. v. Canada (Attorney General) et al.

Supreme Court of Canada

Lamer, C.J.C., L'Heureux-Dubé, Gonthier,

Cory, Iacobucci, Major and Binnie, JJ.

December 10, 1998.

Summary:

During a power outage, an industrial plant discharged a quantity of chlorine into a near­by inlet, killing a number of fish. The oper­ators of the plant reported the discharge. A Fisheries officer investigated. The officer subsequently obtained a search warrant under s. 487(1)(b) of the Criminal Code to search for various documents. The operators were charged with offences under the Fisheries Act and the Waste Management Act. The oper­ators petitioned for certiorari to quash the search warrant. A Chambers judge allowed the petition. The Crown appealed.

The British Columbia Court of Appeal, Southin, J.A., dissenting, in a decision re­ported 90 B.C.A.C. 126; 147 W.A.C. 126, dismissed the appeal. The Crown appealed.

The Supreme Court of Canada allowed the appeal.

Criminal Law - Topic 3045

Special powers - Search warrants - Scope of - [See Criminal Law - Topic 3148].

Criminal Law - Topic 3148

Special powers - Power of search - Scope of power - Section 487(1)(b) of the Crim­inal Code authorized the issuance of a warrant to search for "evidence with respect to the commission of an offence" - The Supreme Court of Canada held that warrants issued under s. 487(1)(b) author­ized investi­gators to search for and seize evidence that may relate to potential de­fences, such as due diligence - The court stated that "evidence with respect to the commission of an offence" encompassed all materials which might shed light on the circumstances of an event which appears to constitute an offence - Anything rel­evant or rationally connected to the inci­dent under investigation, the parties involved, and their potential culpability fell within the scope of the warrant - It was in the public interest that all relevant infor­mation and evidence be located and pre­served as soon as possible - Further, fairness de­manded that the Crown be able to fairly seek and obtain evidence rebut­ting an accused's defences.

Criminal Law - Topic 3163

Special powers - Power of seizure - Extent of power - [See Criminal Law - Topic 3148].

Statutes - Topic 516

Interpretation - General principles - Ordi­nary meaning of words - The Supreme Court of Canada stated that "[s]tatutory provisions should be read to give the words their most obvious ordinary mean­ing which accords with the context and pur­pose of the enactment in which they occur; ... It is only when genuine ambi­guity arises between two or more plausible readings, each equally in accordance with the inten­tions of the statute, that the courts need to resort to external interpretive aids." - See paragraph 14.

Statutes - Topic 1414

Interpretation - Construction where mean­ing is not plain - Ambiguity - [See Stat­utes - Topic 516].

Statutes - Topic 1601

Interpretation - Extrinsic aids - General - [See Statutes - Topic 516].

Words and Phrases

Evidence with respect to the commission of an offence - The Supreme Court of Canada discussed the meaning of this phrase, as found in s. 487(1)(b) of the Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46.

Cases Noticed:

Domtar Inc., Re (1995), 18 C.E.L.R.(N.S.) 106 (B.C.S.C.), refd to. [para. 11].

Rizzo & Rizzo Shoes Ltd. (Bankrupt), Re, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 27; 221 N.R. 241; 106 O.A.C. 1, refd to. [para. 14].

Nowegijick v. Minister of National Rev­enue et al., [1983] 1 S.C.R. 29; 46 N.R. 41; 83 D.T.C. 5041; 144 D.L.R.(3d) 193, refd to. [para. 16].

R. v. McIntosh (B.B.), [1995] 1 S.C.R. 686; 178 N.R. 161; 79 O.A.C. 81; 95 C.C.C.(3d) 481, refd to. [para. 18].

R. v. Church of Scientology of Toronto and Zaharia (1987), 18 O.A.C. 321; 31 C.C.C.(3d) 449 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 22].

R. v. Storrey, [1990] 1 S.C.R. 241; 105 N.R. 81; 37 O.A.C. 161; 53 C.C.C.(3d) 316, refd to. [para. 23].

Nelles v. Ontario et al., [1989] 2 S.C.R. 170; 98 N.R. 321; 35 O.A.C. 161; 60 D.L.R.(4th) 609; 49 C.C.L.T. 217, refd to. [para. 25].

R. v. Levogiannis, [1993] 4 S.C.R. 475; 160 N.R. 371; 67 O.A.C. 321; 25 C.R.(4th) 325; 85 C.C.C.(3d) 327; 18 C.R.R.(2d) 242, refd to. [para. 27].

Southam Inc. v. Hunter, [1984] 2 S.C.R. 145; 55 N.R. 241; 55 A.R. 291; 9 C.R.R. 355; 14 C.C.C.(3d) 97; 41 C.R.(3d) 97; [1984] 6 W.W.R. 577; 33 Alta. L.R.(2d) 193; 27 B.L.R. 297; 84 D.T.C. 6467; 2 C.P.R.(3d) 1; 11 D.L.R.(4th) 641, refd to. [para. 28].

Descôteaux et al. v. Mierzwinski et al., [1982] 1 S.C.R. 860; 44 N.R. 462; 141 D.L.R.(3d) 590; 70 C.C.C.(2d) 385, refd to. [para. 28].

Thomson Newspapers Ltd. v. Director of Investigation and Research, Combines Investigation Act et al., [1990] 1 S.C.R. 425; 106 N.R. 161; 39 O.A.C. 161; 54 C.C.C.(3d) 417; 76 C.R.(3d) 129; 67 D.L.R.(4th) 161; 29 C.P.R.(3d) 97; 47 C.R.R. 1, refd to. [para. 28].

Baron et al. v. Minister of National Rev­enue et al., [1993] 1 S.C.R. 416; 146 N.R. 270; 78 C.C.C.(3d) 510; 18 C.R.(4th) 274, refd to. [para. 28].

Statutes Noticed:

Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46, sect. 487(1)(b) [para. 13].

Authors and Works Noticed:

Kaufman Report - see Ontario, Attorney General Report, The Commission on Proceedings Involving Guy Paul Morin.

Ontario, Attorney General Report, The Commission on Proceedings Involving Guy Paul Morin (Kaufman Report) (1998), vol. 1, pp. 479 to 482 [para. 24].

Counsel:

S. David Frankel, Q.C., and Kenneth Yule, for the appellant;

Gary A. Letcher, Jonathan S. McLean and Eric B. Miller, for the respondents;

Michal Fairburn, for the intervener.

Solicitors of Record:

Attorney General of Canada, Vancouver, British Columbia, for the appellant;

Edwards, Kenny & Bray, Vancouver, British Columbia, for the respondents;

Attorney General of Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, for the intervener.

This appeal was heard on December 10, 1998, by Lamer, C.J.C., L'Heureux-Dubé, Gonthier, Cory, Iacobucci, Major and Binnie, JJ., of the Supreme Court of Canada. On December 10, 1998, Major, J., rendered oral judgment for the Court and the following written reasons were released in both official languages on April 23, 1999.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
292 practice notes
  • Bell ExpressVu Limited Partnership v. Rex et al., (2002) 287 N.R. 248 (SCC)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Supreme Court of Canada
    • April 26, 2002
    ...Bank Ltd. v. Zang, [1966] A.C. 182 (H.L.), refd to. [para. 29]. CanadianOxy Chemicals Ltd. et al. v. Canada (Attorney General) et al., [1999] 1 S.C.R. 743; 237 N.R. 373; 122 B.C.A.C. 1; 200 W.A.C. 1, refd to. [para. Québec v. Carrières Ste-Thérèse Ltée, [1985] 1 S.C.R. 831; 59 N.R. 391, ref......
  • R. v. Vice Media Canada Inc., 2018 SCC 53
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • November 30, 2018
    ...[1989] 1 S.C.R. 1572; R. v. Khawaja, 2012 SCC 69, [2012] 3 S.C.R. 555; CanadianOxy Chemicals Ltd. v. Canada (Attorney General), [1999] 1 S.C.R. 743; Descôteaux v. Mierzwinski, [1982] 1 S.C.R. 860; R. v. Canadian Broadcasting Corp. (2001), 52 O.R. (3d) 757; R. v. Araujo, 2000 SCC 65, [2000] ......
  • R v Basque,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • June 30, 2023
    ...418; Marcotte v. Deputy Attorney General for Canada, [1976] 1 S.C.R. 108; CanadianOxy Chemicals Ltd. v. Canada (Attorney General), [1999] 1 S.C.R. 743. APPEAL from a judgment of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal (Richard C.J. and Baird and French JJ.A.), 2021 NBCA 50, 410 C.C.C. (3d) 228, 8......
  • R. v. Araujo, 2000 SCC 65
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • December 14, 2000
    ...130 C.C.C. (3d) 53; Rizzo & Rizzo Shoes Ltd. (Re), [1998] 1 S.C.R. 27; CanadianOxy Chemicals Ltd. v. Canada (Attorney General), [1999] 1 S.C.R. 743; R. v. Madsen, [1988] N.W.T.R. 82; R. v. Todoruk (1992), 78 C.C.C. (3d) 139; R. v. McCreery, [1996] B.C.J. No. 2405 (QL); R. v. Shalala (20......
  • Get Started for Free
242 cases
  • Professional Institute of the Public Service of Canada v. Canada (Attorney General), [2012] 3 SCR 660
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • December 19, 2012
    ...Bell ExpressVu Limited Partnership v. Rex, 2002 SCC 42, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 559; CanadianOxy Chemicals Ltd. v. Canada (Attorney General), [1999] 1 S.C.R. 743; United States of America v. Dynar, [1997] 2 S.C.R. 462; Galambos v. Perez, 2009 SCC 48, [2009] 3 S.C.R. 247; Guerin v. The Queen, [1984]......
  • Bell ExpressVu Limited Partnership v. Rex et al., (2002) 166 B.C.A.C. 1 (SCC)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Supreme Court of Canada
    • April 26, 2002
    ...Bank Ltd. v. Zang, [1966] A.C. 182 (H.L.), refd to. [para. 29]. CanadianOxy Chemicals Ltd. et al. v. Canada (Attorney General) et al., [1999] 1 S.C.R. 743; 237 N.R. 373; 122 B.C.A.C. 1; 200 W.A.C. 1, refd to. [para. Québec v. Carrières Ste-Thérèse Ltée, [1985] 1 S.C.R. 831; 59 N.R. 391, ref......
  • Wilson v. British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles), 2015 SCC 47
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • October 16, 2015
    ...Bell ExpressVu Limited Partnership v. Rex, 2002 SCC 42, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 559; CanadianOxy Chemicals Ltd. v. Canada (Attorney General), [1999] 1 S.C.R. 743; R. v. Clarke, 2014 SCC 28, [2014] 1 S.C.R. 612; Charlebois v. Saint John (City), 2005 SCC 74, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 563; Bristol‑Myers Squibb ......
  • R. v. Araujo (A.) et al., 2000 SCC 65
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Supreme Court of Canada
    • December 14, 2000
    ...1 S.C.R. 27; 221 N.R. 241; 106 O.A.C. 1, refd to. [para. 26]. CanadianOxy Chemicals Ltd. et al. v. Canada (Attorney General) et al., [1999] 1 S.C.R. 743; 237 N.R. 373; 122 B.C.A.C. 1; 100 W.A.C. 1, refd to. [para. R. v. Madsen, [1988] N.W.T.R. 82 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 28]. R. v. Todoruk (......
  • Get Started for Free
5 firm's commentaries
  • COURT OF APPEAL SUMMARIES (MAY 11 – 15, 2020)
    • Canada
    • LexBlog Canada
    • May 19, 2020
    ...v. Le, 2019 SCC 34, R. v. Kitaitchik (2002), 166 C.C.C. (3d) 14 (Ont. C.A.), CanadianOxy Chemicals Ltd. v. Canada(Attorney General), [1999] 1 S.C.R. 743, R. v. McGuffie, 2016 ONCA 365, R. v. Schulz, 2018 ONCA 598 CIVIL DECISIONS TriDelta Investment Counsel Inc. v. GTA Mixed-Use Developments......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (May 11 ' 15, 2020)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • May 22, 2020
    ...v. Le, 2019 SCC 34, R. v. Kitaitchik (2002), 166 C.C.C. (3d) 14 (Ont. C.A.), CanadianOxy Chemicals Ltd. v. Canada(Attorney General), [1999] 1 S.C.R. 743, R. v. McGuffie, 2016 ONCA 365, R. v. Schulz, 2018 ONCA 598 CIVIL DECISIONS TriDelta Investment Counsel Inc. v. GTA Mixed-Use Developments......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (May 25 ' 29, 2020)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • June 10, 2020
    ...v. Morelli, 2010 SCC 8, R. v. Araujo, 2000 SCC 65, R. v. Nero, 2016 ONCA 160, CanadianOxy Chemicals Ltd. v. Canada (Attorney General), [1999] 1 S.C.R. 743, R. v. Jones, 2011 ONCA 632, R. v. Lights, 2020 ONCA 128, R. v. R.P., 2012 SCC 22. R. v. Villaroman, 2016 SCC 33 R. v. B., 2020 ONCA 318......
  • Top 5 Civil Appeals from the Court of Appeal - Revised Version (December 2012)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • January 3, 2013
    ...phrase "in respect of" twice in the definition. As the Supreme Court held in CanadianOxy Chemicals Ltd. v. Canada (Attorney General), [1999] 1 S.C.R. 743, the words "in respect of" are of the widest scope possible, "conveying some link or connection between two related Because the sharehold......
  • Get Started for Free
44 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Environmental Law. Third Edition
    • September 8, 2009
    ...72 (C.A.) ................................................................ 253 CanadianOxy Chemicals Ltd. v. Canada (A.G.) (1998), [1999] 1 S.C.R. 743, [1998] S.C.J. No. 87, (1999), 29 C.E.L.R. (N.S.) 1 ................... 175 EnvironmEntal law 416 Canadians for the Abolition of the Seal Hu......
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Statutory Interpretation. Third Edition Preliminary Sections
    • June 23, 2016
    ...270 Canadian Oxy Chemicals Ltd v Canada (Attorney General) (1998), [1999] 1 SCR 743, 171 DLR (4th) 733, [1998] SCJ No 87 ...........................230 Canadian Pacific Ltd v Canada (1994), 171 NR 64, 2 GTC 7233, [1994] FCJ No 933 (CA) .............................................................
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Criminal Procedure. Third Edition
    • August 29, 2016
    ...122, 43 CCC (3d) 24, [1988] SCJ No 67 ............................... 428 CanadianOxy Chemicals Ltd v Canada (Attorney General) (1998), [1999] 1 SCR 743, 133 CCC (3d) 426, [1998] SCJ No 87.............................117 Cathro v the Queen (1955), [1956] SCR 101, 113 CCC 225, [1955] SCJ No ......
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books International Human Rights Law Preliminary Sections
    • June 18, 2004
    ...and Huck, [1985] 3 W.W.R. 717 (Sask C.A.) .................. 211 CanadianOxy Chemicals Ltd. v. Canada (Attorney General), [1999] 1 S.C.R. 743 ..........................................................................................155– 56 Capital Cities Communications v. CRTC, [1978] 2 S.C......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT