Cao v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1696

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
CourtFederal Court (Canada)
Citation2022 FC 1696
Date08 December 2022
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • Jamali v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1328
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • October 5, 2023
    ...entire working file electronic or otherwise underlying their decision, they must ask for it: Cao v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1696: [44] First, it is well established that reasons for a decision found in the Officer’s GCMS notes are a constituent part of an adminis......
  • Haghshenas v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 464
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • March 31, 2023
    ...entire working file electronic or otherwise underlying their decision, they must ask for it: Cao v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1696: [44] First, it is well established that reasons for a decision found in the Officer’s GCMS notes are a constituent part of an adminis......
  • Shahbazian v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1556
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • November 23, 2023
    ...9 of the Federal Courts Citizenship, Immigration and Refugee Protection Rules, SOR/93-22 [see Cao v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1696 at para [28] To the extent that the Applicant’s submissions seek to assert that there was a reasonable apprehension of bias, such all......
  • Ardestani v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 874
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • June 21, 2023
    ...letter, it is incumbent on the Applicant to seek further elaboration under Rule 9 [see Cao v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1696 at para [28] The Applicant further asserts that the Applicant had a reasonable expectation of having the concerns raised by the Officer put to him ......
4 cases
  • Jamali v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1328
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • October 5, 2023
    ...entire working file electronic or otherwise underlying their decision, they must ask for it: Cao v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1696: [44] First, it is well established that reasons for a decision found in the Officer’s GCMS notes are a constituent part of an adminis......
  • Haghshenas v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 464
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • March 31, 2023
    ...entire working file electronic or otherwise underlying their decision, they must ask for it: Cao v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1696: [44] First, it is well established that reasons for a decision found in the Officer’s GCMS notes are a constituent part of an adminis......
  • Shahbazian v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1556
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • November 23, 2023
    ...9 of the Federal Courts Citizenship, Immigration and Refugee Protection Rules, SOR/93-22 [see Cao v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1696 at para [28] To the extent that the Applicant’s submissions seek to assert that there was a reasonable apprehension of bias, such all......
  • Ardestani v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 874
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • June 21, 2023
    ...letter, it is incumbent on the Applicant to seek further elaboration under Rule 9 [see Cao v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1696 at para [28] The Applicant further asserts that the Applicant had a reasonable expectation of having the concerns raised by the Officer put to him ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT