Cardillo v. Willowdale Contracting et.al, 2020 ONSC 2193

JurisdictionOntario
JudgeLEMAY J
Citation2020 ONSC 2193
Docket NumberCV-13-4730-SR
CourtSuperior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
Date22 April 2020
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 practice notes
  • Ever Fresh Direct Foods Inc. v. Jamia Islamia Canada Ltd., 2021 ONSC 1278
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • February 19, 2021
    ...5, 49-50. [20]       I agree with the decision of LeMay J. in Cardillo v. Willowdale Contracting et. al., 2020 ONSC 2193, at paras. 49-53, where he determined that where a plaintiff brings a motion under rule 48.11 and the defendant brings a cross-motion under ......
  • Gu v. Wang,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • September 1, 2021
    ...on the Plaintiff when a motion is brought to set aside a dismissal under Rule 48.11.  See Cardillo v. Willowdale Contracting et. al. 2020 ONSC 2193 and Ever Fresh Direct Foods v. Jamia Islamia Canada 2021 ONSC 1278.  However, this is a motion brought by the Defendant to mandate th......
  • Avdeeva v. Khankaldiyan,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • April 9, 2021
    ...1 at para. 28). The plaintiff bears the onus of rebutting the presumption of prejudice (Cardillo v. Willowdale Int’l Contracting Ltd., 2020 ONSC 2193 at para. [25] It is also open to a defendant to lead evidence of actual prejudice which may also form the basis for dismissal (Ticchiarelli a......
3 cases
  • Ever Fresh Direct Foods Inc. v. Jamia Islamia Canada Ltd., 2021 ONSC 1278
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • February 19, 2021
    ...5, 49-50. [20]       I agree with the decision of LeMay J. in Cardillo v. Willowdale Contracting et. al., 2020 ONSC 2193, at paras. 49-53, where he determined that where a plaintiff brings a motion under rule 48.11 and the defendant brings a cross-motion under ......
  • Gu v. Wang,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • September 1, 2021
    ...on the Plaintiff when a motion is brought to set aside a dismissal under Rule 48.11.  See Cardillo v. Willowdale Contracting et. al. 2020 ONSC 2193 and Ever Fresh Direct Foods v. Jamia Islamia Canada 2021 ONSC 1278.  However, this is a motion brought by the Defendant to mandate th......
  • Avdeeva v. Khankaldiyan,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • April 9, 2021
    ...1 at para. 28). The plaintiff bears the onus of rebutting the presumption of prejudice (Cardillo v. Willowdale Int’l Contracting Ltd., 2020 ONSC 2193 at para. [25] It is also open to a defendant to lead evidence of actual prejudice which may also form the basis for dismissal (Ticchiarelli a......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT