A Career Path Leading to Well‐being and Success
Author | Jacques Forest,Sarah Girouard |
Date | 01 June 2019 |
DOI | http://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.1488 |
Published date | 01 June 2019 |
A Career Path Leading to Well-being and Success
Sarah Girouard*
Alia Conseil
Jacques Forest
Université du Québec à Montréal
Abstract
In line with self-determination theory (Deci & Ryan, 2000),
this study aims to determine the influence of different
contents and motives of career aspirations, together with
objective career success, on subjective career success and
well-being. Moreover,it aims to verify if psychological need,
satisfaction, and frustration play a mediating role in these
relationships. Results suggest that the pursuit of some aspi-
rations and the underlying motives for their pursuit are more
beneficial. Aspiration contents, and aspiration motives, to-
gether with objective career success, influence subjective
well-being and subjective career success, in part because
they satisfy or frustrate psychological needs. This study
brings together two fields of research evolving in parallel
—career and life aspirations—to shed new light on both
of them. Copyright © 2018 ASAC. Published by John Wiley
& Sons, Ltd.
Keywords: career aspirations, motivation, career success,
subjective well-being, psychological needs
Résumé
En phase avec la théorie de l’autodétermination (Deci &
Ryan, 2000), la présente étude a pour but de déterminer
l’influence de différents contenus et motifs d’aspirations de
carrière ainsi que du succès de carrière objectif, sur le
succès de carrière subjectif et le bien-être au travail. De
plus, elle vise à vérifier si la satisfaction et la frustration
des besoins psychologiques jouent un rôle médiateur dans
ces relations. Les résultats suggèrent que la poursuite de
certaines aspirations et certains deses motifs sous-jacents
à leur poursuite sont plus bénéfiques que d’autres. Les
contenus des aspirations et leurs motifs de poursuite,
conjointement au succès de carrière objectif, influencent le
bien-être subjectif et le succès de carrière subjectif, en partie
parce qu’ils satisfont ou frustrent les besoins psychologiques.
Cette étude fait le pont entre deux champs de recherche
qui auparavant évoluaient en parallèle, et ce, afin de leur
apporter, tous deux, un éclairage nouveau. Copyright ©
2018 ASAC. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Mots-clés: aspirations de carrière, motivation, succès de
carrière, bien-être subjectif, besoins psychologiques
Introduction
In recent decades, profound transformation in work en-
vironments has changed the concept of career, from an idea
of "career" implying opportunities for linear advancement
within the organization (Greenhaus, Callanan, & Godshalk,
2010) to a variety of pathways, such as non-linear, protean,
or boundaryless careers (Briscoe, Hall, & DeMuth, 2006),
where everyone owns more freedom, but also more respon-
sibility to set the path they wish to follow (Baruch, 2006;
Cardinal, 2006; Dries, 2011).
Transformation of Careers and Conceptions of Career
Success
In that career transformation context, achieving objec-
tive criteria of success like vertical advancement seems to
be more limited than it was before. Two different forms of
success thus emerged. The first one, in line with traditional
conceptions of career, is called “objective success,”because
it can be judged by criteria observable to others, such as
income (as observed by Judge, Higgins, Thoreson, &
Barrick, 1999; Ng, Eby, Sorenson, & Feldman, 2005), pro-
motions (seen in De Vos, Klippeleer, & Dewilde, 2009;
Ng et al., 2005) or hierarchical status (as in Dries, 2011;
Ng & Feldman, 2010). The second one, in line with new
conceptions of the career, is called “subjective success,”
and extends to include the sense of achievement related
to workers’diverse personal aspirations (Mirvis & Hall,
1994). In order to encompass all of these different criteria,
satisfaction with personal career aspirations is often used to
conceptualize and measure subjective career success
(Hall, 1996). It generally comprises satisfaction with both
external (for example, salary or hierarchical status) and
Given that this article has been supported financially, we wish to thank the
organizations that believed in our project: the Fonds de recherche du
Québec-Société et Culture (FQRSC), the Syndicat des professionnelles et
professionels du Gouvernement du Québec (SPGQ), and the Université du
Québec à Montréal Fonds à l’accessibilité et à la réussite des études
(FARE). Their funding has contributed to the design, data collection and
writing of this research project.
*Please address correspondence to: Sarah Girouard, PhD, Alia Conseil,
2960 Laurier Blvd., Iberville III, Office 214, Quebec, Quebec, Canada,
G1V 4S1. Email: girouard.sarah@gmail.com
Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences
Revue canadienne des sciences de l’administration
36: 193–207 (2019)
Published online 30 March 2018 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com) DOI: 10.1002/CJAS.1488
Can J Adm Sci
36(2), 193–207 (2019)Copyright © 2018 ASAC. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 193
To continue reading
Request your trial