Carhoun and Sons Enterprises Ltd. v. Canada (Attorney General), 2018 BCSC 1675
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Honourable Chief Justice Hinkson |
| Citation | 2018 BCSC 1675 |
| Docket Number | S133770 |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Date | 28 September 2018 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 practice notes
-
Slater v Pedigree Poultry Ltd.,
...in Whiten have been applied to the tort of misfeasance in public office. Carhoun and Sons Enterprises Ltd. v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 BCSC 1675, is an example. That case makes clear that the primary consideration in awarding punitive damages for misfeasance in public office is whethe......
-
Ivans v. Glenmore-Ellison Improvement District, 2018 BCSC 2301
...and the defendant such that it would be just to impose a duty of care: Carhoun and Sons Enterprises Ltd. v. Canada (Attorney General), 2018 BCSC 1675 at para. 370 (“Carhoun 2018”). [116] The parties did not discuss foreseeability, perhaps because it is ......
-
Tekamar Mortgage Fund Ltd. v. British Columbia (Attorney General),
...both causes of actions pleaded by the plaintiff. The defendant relies on Carhoun and Sons Enterprise Ltd. v. Canada (Attorney General), 2018 BCSC 1675 at para. 364; and Odhavji Estate v. Woodhouse, 2003 SCC 69. The plaintiffs rely on Allied Maples Group v. Simmons & Simmons, [1995] 1 W.......
-
Tsai v. Li, 2019 BCSC 1317
...of expert evidence. [ SEQ Numbracket\* arabic \* MERGEFORMAT 131] In Carhoun and Sons Enterprises Ltd. v. Canada (Attorney General), 2018 BCSC 1675, a non-real estate case, Hinkson C.J. [405] In the absence of expert evidence as to the requisite standard of care, the court may look to exter......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 cases
-
Slater v Pedigree Poultry Ltd.,
...in Whiten have been applied to the tort of misfeasance in public office. Carhoun and Sons Enterprises Ltd. v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 BCSC 1675, is an example. That case makes clear that the primary consideration in awarding punitive damages for misfeasance in public office is whethe......
-
Ivans v. Glenmore-Ellison Improvement District, 2018 BCSC 2301
...and the defendant such that it would be just to impose a duty of care: Carhoun and Sons Enterprises Ltd. v. Canada (Attorney General), 2018 BCSC 1675 at para. 370 (“Carhoun 2018”). [116] The parties did not discuss foreseeability, perhaps because it is ......
-
Tekamar Mortgage Fund Ltd. v. British Columbia (Attorney General),
...both causes of actions pleaded by the plaintiff. The defendant relies on Carhoun and Sons Enterprise Ltd. v. Canada (Attorney General), 2018 BCSC 1675 at para. 364; and Odhavji Estate v. Woodhouse, 2003 SCC 69. The plaintiffs rely on Allied Maples Group v. Simmons & Simmons, [1995] 1 W.......
-
Tsai v. Li, 2019 BCSC 1317
...of expert evidence. [ SEQ Numbracket\* arabic \* MERGEFORMAT 131] In Carhoun and Sons Enterprises Ltd. v. Canada (Attorney General), 2018 BCSC 1675, a non-real estate case, Hinkson C.J. [405] In the absence of expert evidence as to the requisite standard of care, the court may look to exter......
1 firm's commentaries
-
What Level Of Information Does A Proponent Need To Start An Environmental Assessment?
...The B.C. Supreme Court addressed this question late in September 2018 in Carhoun and Sons Enterprises Ltd. v Canada (Attorney General) 2018 BCSC 1675. The plaintiff brought an action against the federal government both for negligence and misfeasance. The plaintiff alleged that its applicati......