Carreon-Rivera v. Zhang, [2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 709 (SC)

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeRoss, J.
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Subject MatterTORTS,DAMAGES,DAMAGE AWARDS
Citation[2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 709 (SC),2014 BCSC 709,[2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 709
Date25 April 2014
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
10 practice notes
  • Hauk v. Shatzko, 2020 BCSC 344
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 11 March 2020
    ...v. Cinnamon-Lopez, 2016 BCSC 81. [212] In response, the defence relies on: Belos v. Michaels, 2017 BCSC 1217; Carreon-Rivera v. Zhang, 2014 BCSC 709; Mullens v. Toor, 2016 BCSC 1645; Chong v. Nguyen, 2017 BCSC 1564; and Smusz v. Wolfe Chevrolet Ltd., 2010 BCSC 82. [213] I summarize the esse......
  • Jamal v. Kemery-Higgins, 2017 BCSC 213
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 9 February 2017
    ...as indicative of the appropriate range of non-pecuniary damages, prior to factoring in the impact of mitigation: Carreon-Rivera v. Zhang, 2014 BCSC 709; Castro v. Krause, 2015 BCSC 2074; and Thomasson v. Moellar, 2014 BCSC 2465, aff’d 2016 BCCA 14. The non-pecuniary damages in these cases r......
  • Xu v. Balaski, 2020 BCSC 940
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 24 June 2020
    ...that non-pecuniary damages should be in the range of $80,000-$100,000. The defendants rely upon the cases of Carreon-Rivera v. Zhang, 2014 BCSC 709; Dhillon v. Singer, 2017 BCSC 414; Dabu v. Schwab, 2016 BCSC 613; and Tsalamadris v. MacDonald, 2011 BCSC [129] After a review of each of the c......
  • Craven v. Brar, 2022 BCSC 291
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 25 February 2022
    ...relies on Wang v. Johal, 2019 BCSC 1036, Morgan v. Allen, 2017 BCSC 1958, Kagrimanyan v. Weir, 2018 BCSC 1458, Carreon-Rivera v. Zhang, 2014 BCSC 709, and Hale v. Keyes, 2020 BCSC 559, where awards ranged from $62,000 to $80,000 for non-pecuniary damages in cases with a range of physical an......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
10 cases
  • Hauk v. Shatzko, 2020 BCSC 344
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 11 March 2020
    ...v. Cinnamon-Lopez, 2016 BCSC 81. [212] In response, the defence relies on: Belos v. Michaels, 2017 BCSC 1217; Carreon-Rivera v. Zhang, 2014 BCSC 709; Mullens v. Toor, 2016 BCSC 1645; Chong v. Nguyen, 2017 BCSC 1564; and Smusz v. Wolfe Chevrolet Ltd., 2010 BCSC 82. [213] I summarize the esse......
  • Jamal v. Kemery-Higgins, 2017 BCSC 213
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 9 February 2017
    ...as indicative of the appropriate range of non-pecuniary damages, prior to factoring in the impact of mitigation: Carreon-Rivera v. Zhang, 2014 BCSC 709; Castro v. Krause, 2015 BCSC 2074; and Thomasson v. Moellar, 2014 BCSC 2465, aff’d 2016 BCCA 14. The non-pecuniary damages in these cases r......
  • Xu v. Balaski, 2020 BCSC 940
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 24 June 2020
    ...that non-pecuniary damages should be in the range of $80,000-$100,000. The defendants rely upon the cases of Carreon-Rivera v. Zhang, 2014 BCSC 709; Dhillon v. Singer, 2017 BCSC 414; Dabu v. Schwab, 2016 BCSC 613; and Tsalamadris v. MacDonald, 2011 BCSC [129] After a review of each of the c......
  • Craven v. Brar,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 25 February 2022
    ...relies on Wang v. Johal, 2019 BCSC 1036, Morgan v. Allen, 2017 BCSC 1958, Kagrimanyan v. Weir, 2018 BCSC 1458, Carreon-Rivera v. Zhang, 2014 BCSC 709, and Hale v. Keyes, 2020 BCSC 559, where awards ranged from $62,000 to $80,000 for non-pecuniary damages in cases with a range of physical an......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT