Carter v Alberta (Ministry of Justice and Solicitor General), 2019 ABQB 491
| Judge | Honourable Madam Justice Janice R. Ashcroft |
| Citation | 2019 ABQB 491 |
| Docket Number | 1801 05226 |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Date | 09 August 2019 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
10 practice notes
-
Makis v Alberta Health Services, 2020 ABCA 168
...560 at pp. 568-9. She has in fact invoked that power to prevent abuses: see Carter v Alberta (Ministry of Justice and Solicitor General), 2019 ABQB 491 at para. 33. The Commissioner’s enabling statutes also contain “gatekeeping” provisions. For example, s. 55(1) of the Freedom of Informatio......
-
Rana v Rana, 2022 ABQB 139
...[18] After review of the recent Carter v Alberta (Ministry of Justice and Solicitor General), 2019 ABQB 491 and Makis v Alberta Health Services, 2020 ABCA 168 decisions, Mr. Z. Rana withdraws his request that this Court impose gatekeeping steps on M......
-
Hayden v Hayden, 2020 ABQB 700
...steps. While an order of that kind by this court is possible (see e.g. Carter v Alberta (Ministry of Justice and Solicitor General), 2019 ABQB 491), the Commissioner is the appropriate party to initiate that step (Makis v Alberta Health Services, 2020 ABCA 168 at para Dated at the City of C......
-
Carter v Information and Privacy Commissioner, 2022 ABQB 517
...On September 19, 2019, in a Decision of Ashcroft J reported as Carter v Alberta (Ministry of Justice and Solicitor General), 2019 ABQB 491 [Carter #1], Glen Carter [Mr. Carter] was made subject to court access restrictions and limited in conducting activities pursuant to the Freedom of Inf......
Get Started for Free
10 cases
-
Makis v Alberta Health Services, 2020 ABCA 168
...560 at pp. 568-9. She has in fact invoked that power to prevent abuses: see Carter v Alberta (Ministry of Justice and Solicitor General), 2019 ABQB 491 at para. 33. The Commissioner’s enabling statutes also contain “gatekeeping” provisions. For example, s. 55(1) of the Freedom of Informatio......
-
Rana v Rana, 2022 ABQB 139
...[18] After review of the recent Carter v Alberta (Ministry of Justice and Solicitor General), 2019 ABQB 491 and Makis v Alberta Health Services, 2020 ABCA 168 decisions, Mr. Z. Rana withdraws his request that this Court impose gatekeeping steps on M......
-
Hayden v Hayden, 2020 ABQB 700
...steps. While an order of that kind by this court is possible (see e.g. Carter v Alberta (Ministry of Justice and Solicitor General), 2019 ABQB 491), the Commissioner is the appropriate party to initiate that step (Makis v Alberta Health Services, 2020 ABCA 168 at para Dated at the City of C......
-
Carter v Information and Privacy Commissioner, 2022 ABQB 517
...On September 19, 2019, in a Decision of Ashcroft J reported as Carter v Alberta (Ministry of Justice and Solicitor General), 2019 ABQB 491 [Carter #1], Glen Carter [Mr. Carter] was made subject to court access restrictions and limited in conducting activities pursuant to the Freedom of Inf......
Get Started for Free