Chadwick et al. v. Canada (Attorney General) et al., 2010 BCSC 1744

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeMyers, J.
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Subject MatterPRACTICE,AERONAUTICS,TORTS
Citation2010 BCSC 1744,[2010] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1744,[2010] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1744 (SC)
Date06 December 2010
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 practice notes
  • British Columbia (Workers' Compensation Board) v. Flanagan  Enterprises (Nevada) Inc., 2017 BCSC 99
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 23 Enero 2017
    ...of Health), 2008 ONCA 660 at para 44, and Drady v Canada (Minister of Health), 2008 ONCA 659; Chadwick v Canada (Attorney General), 2010 BCSC 1744; and Ratt v 101004597 Saskatchewan Ltd, 2012 SKQB 532. See also The Los Angeles Salad Inc v Canadian Food Inspection Agency, 2013 BCCA 34, leave......
  • Ratt v. 101004597 Saskatchewan Ltd. et al., 2012 SKQB 532
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 19 Diciembre 2012
    ...al., [2009] O.T.C. Uned. O03 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 9]. Chadwick et al. v. Canada (Attorney General) et al., [2010] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1744; 2010 BCSC 1744, refd to. [para. Anns v. Merton London Borough Council, [1977] 2 All E.R. 492 (H.L.), refd to. [para. 21]. Cooper v. Hobart - see Cooper v......
  • Gill v. Canada (Attorney General) et al., [2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 582
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 4 Abril 2014
    ...from that endangering purely economic interests. [Emphasis added.] [148] The plaintiff relies on Chadwick v. Canada (Attorney General) , 2010 BCSC 1744 to argue case law has found that TCCA owes duty of care in some circumstances, but concedes that the facts of Chadwick probably do not go f......
  • Delarue v. Morrison et al., [2015] Sask.R. Uned. 24 (QB)
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 26 Mayo 2015
    ...Sup Ct), Allianz Global Risks US Insurance Co. v. Canada (Attorney General) , 2013 ONSC 7005, Chadwick v. Canada (Attorney General), 2010 BCSC 1744, and Taylor v. Canada (Attorney General), 2012 ONCA 479, 352 DLR (4th) 690. These cases held that it was not plain and obvious that the plainti......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
  • British Columbia (Workers' Compensation Board) v. Flanagan  Enterprises (Nevada) Inc., 2017 BCSC 99
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 23 Enero 2017
    ...of Health), 2008 ONCA 660 at para 44, and Drady v Canada (Minister of Health), 2008 ONCA 659; Chadwick v Canada (Attorney General), 2010 BCSC 1744; and Ratt v 101004597 Saskatchewan Ltd, 2012 SKQB 532. See also The Los Angeles Salad Inc v Canadian Food Inspection Agency, 2013 BCCA 34, leave......
  • Ratt v. 101004597 Saskatchewan Ltd. et al., 2012 SKQB 532
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 19 Diciembre 2012
    ...al., [2009] O.T.C. Uned. O03 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 9]. Chadwick et al. v. Canada (Attorney General) et al., [2010] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1744; 2010 BCSC 1744, refd to. [para. Anns v. Merton London Borough Council, [1977] 2 All E.R. 492 (H.L.), refd to. [para. 21]. Cooper v. Hobart - see Cooper v......
  • Gill v. Canada (Attorney General) et al., [2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 582
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 4 Abril 2014
    ...from that endangering purely economic interests. [Emphasis added.] [148] The plaintiff relies on Chadwick v. Canada (Attorney General) , 2010 BCSC 1744 to argue case law has found that TCCA owes duty of care in some circumstances, but concedes that the facts of Chadwick probably do not go f......
  • Delarue v. Morrison et al., [2015] Sask.R. Uned. 24 (QB)
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 26 Mayo 2015
    ...Sup Ct), Allianz Global Risks US Insurance Co. v. Canada (Attorney General) , 2013 ONSC 7005, Chadwick v. Canada (Attorney General), 2010 BCSC 1744, and Taylor v. Canada (Attorney General), 2012 ONCA 479, 352 DLR (4th) 690. These cases held that it was not plain and obvious that the plainti......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT