Chalich v. Alhatam, 2020 ONSC 2569
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | KRISTJANSON J. |
| Date | 25 April 2020 |
| Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
| Docket Number | 030/20 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 practice notes
-
Meglis v. Lackan, 2020 ONSC 5049
...cases considered the circumstances under which it would be appropriate to make such an order; see, for example, Chalich v. Alhatam, 2020 ONSC 2569 (Div. Ct.) and Neuman v. Anderson, 2020 ONSC [38] At the time of this motion, the Landlord asked that, if I granted the motion quashing the appe......
-
Wilkinson v. Seritsky, 2020 ONSC 5048
...cases considered the circumstances under which it would be appropriate to make such an order; see, for example, Chalich v. Alhatam, 2020 ONSC 2569 (Div. Ct.) and Neuman v. Anderson, 2020 ONSC [39] At the time of this motion, the Landlord asked that, if I granted the motion quashing the appe......
-
What Is "Urgent" Enough? Update On Procedural Priorities During The COVID-19 Lockdown
...overwhelmed Motion re urgency adjourned to panel, at beginning of scheduled three-day hearing on April 21-23 (para 7). Chalich v Alhatam, 2020 ONSC 2569 * April 25, 2020 Motion seeking order to enforce eviction order. Landlord argues motion is urgent because tenancy may jeopardize a real es......
-
Holukoff v. Fenby, 2020 ONSC 4420
...of orders by the Sheriff is to be brought in the Superior Court. [32] In Chalich v. Alhatam, 2020 ONSC 2569 (Div. Ct.), Kristjanson J. confirmed that it is the Superior Court, and not the Divisional Court, that has jurisdiction to grant leave to enf......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 cases
-
Meglis v. Lackan, 2020 ONSC 5049
...cases considered the circumstances under which it would be appropriate to make such an order; see, for example, Chalich v. Alhatam, 2020 ONSC 2569 (Div. Ct.) and Neuman v. Anderson, 2020 ONSC [38] At the time of this motion, the Landlord asked that, if I granted the motion quashing the appe......
-
Wilkinson v. Seritsky, 2020 ONSC 5048
...cases considered the circumstances under which it would be appropriate to make such an order; see, for example, Chalich v. Alhatam, 2020 ONSC 2569 (Div. Ct.) and Neuman v. Anderson, 2020 ONSC [39] At the time of this motion, the Landlord asked that, if I granted the motion quashing the appe......
-
Holukoff v. Fenby, 2020 ONSC 4420
...of orders by the Sheriff is to be brought in the Superior Court. [32] In Chalich v. Alhatam, 2020 ONSC 2569 (Div. Ct.), Kristjanson J. confirmed that it is the Superior Court, and not the Divisional Court, that has jurisdiction to grant leave to enf......
-
NEUMANN v. ANDERSON,
...or behaviour that endangers other tenants, his right to remain in his unit may be revisited. [33] The case of Chalich v. Alhatam, 2020 ONSC 2569, [2020] O.J. No. 1797 (Div. Ct.) did involve an urgent motion brought by a landlord to permit a LTB eviction order to be carried out by the Sherif......
1 firm's commentaries
-
What Is "Urgent" Enough? Update On Procedural Priorities During The COVID-19 Lockdown
...overwhelmed Motion re urgency adjourned to panel, at beginning of scheduled three-day hearing on April 21-23 (para 7). Chalich v Alhatam, 2020 ONSC 2569 * April 25, 2020 Motion seeking order to enforce eviction order. Landlord argues motion is urgent because tenancy may jeopardize a real es......