Chandra v. Canadian Northern Shield Insurance Co., 2006 BCSC 715

JudgeChamberlist, J.
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Case DateDecember 06, 2005
JurisdictionBritish Columbia
Citations2006 BCSC 715;[2006] B.C.T.C. 715 (SC)

Chandra v. Cdn. Northern Shield Ins., [2006] B.C.T.C. 715 (SC)

MLB headnote and full text

Temp. Cite: [2006] B.C.T.C. TBEd. MY.054

Pushpa Chandra and Rakesh Chandra (plaintiffs) v. Canadian Northern Shield Insurance Company Le Bouclier Du Nord Canadien, Compagnie D'Assurance (defendant)

(S050760; 2006 BCSC 715)

Indexed As: Chandra v. Canadian Northern Shield Insurance Co.

British Columbia Supreme Court

Vancouver

Chamberlist, J.

May 4, 2006.

Summary:

This headnote contains no summary.

Insurance - Topic 1851

The insurance contract - Interpretation of contract - General - See paragraphs 35 to 55.

Insurance - Topic 6638

Multi-peril property insurance - Household or homeowner's policies - Exclusions - Water seepage or leakage - See paragraphs 35 to 55.

Counsel:

D.F. Sutherland, for the plaintiffs;

A.N. Epstein, for the defendant.

This action was heard in Chambers, on July 27 and 28 and December 6, 2005, before Chamberlist, J., of the British Columbia Supreme Court, who delivered the following decision on May 4, 2006.

Please Note: The following judgment has not been edited.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 practice notes
  • Dhadwal v. Insurance Corp. of British Columbia, [2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 449
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • March 17, 2014
    ...of interpretation: Derksen v. 539938 Ontario Ltd. , 2001 SCC 72, at paras. 48-49; Chandra v. Canadian Northern Shield Insurance Co. , 2006 BCSC 715, at paras. 27, 50. [65] For the foregoing reasons, I find that all the damage to the Mercedes, including the engine damage, is damage "cau......
1 cases
  • Dhadwal v. Insurance Corp. of British Columbia, [2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 449
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • March 17, 2014
    ...of interpretation: Derksen v. 539938 Ontario Ltd. , 2001 SCC 72, at paras. 48-49; Chandra v. Canadian Northern Shield Insurance Co. , 2006 BCSC 715, at paras. 27, 50. [65] For the foregoing reasons, I find that all the damage to the Mercedes, including the engine damage, is damage "cau......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT