Chang v. Chang,
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Honourable Madam Justice E. McDonald |
| Neutral Citation | 2020 BCSC 1783 |
| Docket Number | E180250 |
| Citation | 2020 BCSC 1783 |
| Date | 20 November 2020 |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
Schmidt v Christie, 2021 ABQB 123
...(Yungwirth J.) at paras 30-33. [4] 2019 ABQB 969 at para 104 [5] A number of cases have adopted this analysis, including Chang v Chang, 2020 BCSC 1783 at para 186 and Kosolofski v Kosolofski, 2016 SKCA 106 at para [6] Reproduced in the proceedings of the 25th Annual Institute of Family Law ......
-
2023 BCSC 588,
...The starting point in determining the fairest division of family property is to notionally divide the property equally: Chang v. Chang, 2020 BCSC 1783 at para. 106. Attached as Appendix A to these reasons is a Scott schedule, wherein I have equally divided the family property as determined ......
-
Hildebrandt v Hildebrandt,
...The starting point in determining the fairest division of family property is to notionally divide the property equally: Chang v. Chang, 2020 BCSC 1783 at para. 106. Attached as Appendix A to these reasons is a Scott schedule, wherein I have equally divided the family property as determined ......
5 cases
-
2024 BCSC 447,
...can lead to a finding that an equal division of family property would be significantly unfair. For example, in Chang v. Chang, 2020 BCSC 1783, the Court divided the family property unequally on the basis of unequal 38 In Chang, the Court described the applicable test at para. 108: To clear ......
-
Hammond v Holtz,
...can lead to a finding that an equal division of family property would be significantly unfair. For example, in Chang v. Chang, 2020 BCSC 1783, the Court divided the family property unequally on the basis of unequal 38 In Chang, the Court described the applicable test at para. 108: To clear ......
-
Schmidt v Christie, 2021 ABQB 123
...(Yungwirth J.) at paras 30-33. [4] 2019 ABQB 969 at para 104 [5] A number of cases have adopted this analysis, including Chang v Chang, 2020 BCSC 1783 at para 186 and Kosolofski v Kosolofski, 2016 SKCA 106 at para [6] Reproduced in the proceedings of the 25th Annual Institute of Family Law ......
-
2023 BCSC 588,
...The starting point in determining the fairest division of family property is to notionally divide the property equally: Chang v. Chang, 2020 BCSC 1783 at para. 106. Attached as Appendix A to these reasons is a Scott schedule, wherein I have equally divided the family property as determined ......
Request a trial to view additional results