Chavez-Salinas v. Tower,
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Abrioux,Griffin,Saunders |
| Citation | 2022 BCCA 43 |
| Docket Number | CA44957 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (British Columbia) |
| Date | 02 February 2022 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
10 practice notes
-
2023 BCSC 988,
...that an award for the cost of future care should be based upon medical justification and should be reasonable. In Chavez-Salinas v. Tower, 2022 BCCA 43, Mr. Justice Abrioux reiterated the legal framework for future care awards: [83] The judge set out the applicable legal principles: Reasons......
-
Sunner v Lee,
...that an award for the cost of future care should be based upon medical justification and should be reasonable. In Chavez-Salinas v. Tower, 2022 BCCA 43, Mr. Justice Abrioux reiterated the legal framework for future care awards: [83] The judge set out the applicable legal principles: Reasons......
-
2023 BCSC 83,
...should not be interfered with if they were available on the evidence and the inference-making process was sound: Chavez-Salinas v. Tower, 2022 BCCA 43, at para. 28, citing Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33 at paras. 10, 21–23. Conversely, inferences that lack support in the record ar......
-
Li v Virk,
...should not be interfered with if they were available on the evidence and the inference-making process was sound: Chavez-Salinas v. Tower, 2022 BCCA 43, at para. 28, citing Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33 at paras. 10, 21–23. Conversely, inferences that lack support in the record ar......
Request a trial to view additional results
10 cases
-
2023 BCSC 988,
...that an award for the cost of future care should be based upon medical justification and should be reasonable. In Chavez-Salinas v. Tower, 2022 BCCA 43, Mr. Justice Abrioux reiterated the legal framework for future care awards: [83] The judge set out the applicable legal principles: Reasons......
-
Sunner v Lee,
...that an award for the cost of future care should be based upon medical justification and should be reasonable. In Chavez-Salinas v. Tower, 2022 BCCA 43, Mr. Justice Abrioux reiterated the legal framework for future care awards: [83] The judge set out the applicable legal principles: Reasons......
-
2023 BCSC 83,
...should not be interfered with if they were available on the evidence and the inference-making process was sound: Chavez-Salinas v. Tower, 2022 BCCA 43, at para. 28, citing Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33 at paras. 10, 21–23. Conversely, inferences that lack support in the record ar......
-
Li v Virk,
...should not be interfered with if they were available on the evidence and the inference-making process was sound: Chavez-Salinas v. Tower, 2022 BCCA 43, at para. 28, citing Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33 at paras. 10, 21–23. Conversely, inferences that lack support in the record ar......
Request a trial to view additional results