Cheecham v. Fort McMurray #468 First Nation, 2020 FC 471
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Citation | 2020 FC 471 |
| Date | 01 April 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
Lavergne-Poitras v. Canada (Attorney General), 2022 FC 1391
...have no impact on Mr. Lavergne-Poitras’s rights because the policy is no longer in effect (Cheecham v Fort McMurray #468 First Nation, 2020 FC 471 at paras 26, 29 [Cheecham]). [15] With regard to Mr. Lavergne-Poitras’s concerns regarding the potential reinstatement of the policy, I agree wi......
-
Pelletier v. Fort William First Nation,
...will skew the proper role of the Court. I concur with the observation of Justice McVeigh in Cheecham v Fort McMurray #468 First Nation, 2020 FC 471 at paragraph 41 that doing what Mr. Pelletier asks would result in this Court rendering a judgment that would intrude into the legislative sphe......
-
Sinclair v. Canada (Attorney General), 2023 FC 750
...that the role of judicial review is not to set a precedent for a hypothetical future case (Cheecham v Fort McMurray #468 First Nation, 2020 FC 471 at para 35). Mr. Sinclair’s position also relies on a number of assumptions: i) that he will again seek permission to run for the same ty......
3 cases
-
Lavergne-Poitras v. Canada (Attorney General), 2022 FC 1391
...have no impact on Mr. Lavergne-Poitras’s rights because the policy is no longer in effect (Cheecham v Fort McMurray #468 First Nation, 2020 FC 471 at paras 26, 29 [Cheecham]). [15] With regard to Mr. Lavergne-Poitras’s concerns regarding the potential reinstatement of the policy, I agree wi......
-
Sinclair v. Canada (Attorney General), 2023 FC 750
...that the role of judicial review is not to set a precedent for a hypothetical future case (Cheecham v Fort McMurray #468 First Nation, 2020 FC 471 at para 35). Mr. Sinclair’s position also relies on a number of assumptions: i) that he will again seek permission to run for the same ty......
-
Pelletier v. Fort William First Nation,
...will skew the proper role of the Court. I concur with the observation of Justice McVeigh in Cheecham v Fort McMurray #468 First Nation, 2020 FC 471 at paragraph 41 that doing what Mr. Pelletier asks would result in this Court rendering a judgment that would intrude into the legislative sphe......