Cheesman et al v. Credit Valley Hospital et al, 2019 ONSC 4996
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | KOEHNEN, J. |
| Date | 26 August 2019 |
| Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
| Docket Number | CV-09-392886-00 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 practice notes
-
Sean Omar Henry v. Dr. Marshall Zaitlen,
...[29] An identical finding was made by Justice Koehnen in Cheesman v. Credit Valley Hospital, 2019 ONSC 4996, who determined, at paras. 66 and 69, that using the wording “caused or contributed” is appropriate in a case involving multipl......
-
Uribe v. Tsandelis, 2019 ONSC 6242
...cases involving multiple tortfeasors. They further directed me to the decision of Cheesman et al v. Credit Valley Hospital et al, 2019 ONSC 4996, (“Cheesman”), wherein Koehnen J. also endorsed the use of the “caused or contributed to” phrase. Their position is that in the current case, the ......
-
Cheesman et al v. Credit Valley Hospital et al., 2020 ONSC 1729
...al., 2019 ONSC 1907; Cheesman et al. v. Credit Valley Hospital et al., 2019 ONSC 5783; Cheesman et al. v. Credit Valley Hospital et al., 2019 ONSC 4996. [14] The case gave rise to 16 examinations for discovery, multiple motions, the preparation and review of more than 24 expert reports, ove......
-
The Uncertainty Behind Ontario's Limitation Periods
...et al v. Credit Valley Hospital et al, 2019 ONSC 4996, the Ontario Supreme Court of Justice provided guidance on some key evidentiary issues: 1) cross-examination of parties who have settled in multi-party litigation, and 2) the admissibility of PowerPoint and other demonstrative aids to fa......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
-
Sean Omar Henry v. Dr. Marshall Zaitlen,
...[29] An identical finding was made by Justice Koehnen in Cheesman v. Credit Valley Hospital, 2019 ONSC 4996, who determined, at paras. 66 and 69, that using the wording “caused or contributed” is appropriate in a case involving multipl......
-
Uribe v. Tsandelis, 2019 ONSC 6242
...cases involving multiple tortfeasors. They further directed me to the decision of Cheesman et al v. Credit Valley Hospital et al, 2019 ONSC 4996, (“Cheesman”), wherein Koehnen J. also endorsed the use of the “caused or contributed to” phrase. Their position is that in the current case, the ......
-
Cheesman et al v. Credit Valley Hospital et al., 2020 ONSC 1729
...al., 2019 ONSC 1907; Cheesman et al. v. Credit Valley Hospital et al., 2019 ONSC 5783; Cheesman et al. v. Credit Valley Hospital et al., 2019 ONSC 4996. [14] The case gave rise to 16 examinations for discovery, multiple motions, the preparation and review of more than 24 expert reports, ove......
-
Niagara North Condominium Corporation No. 139 v. Watts,
...rely on the decisions of Jamieson v. Kapashesit, 2018 CarswellOnt 22773 (S.C.) and Cheesman et al v. Credit Valley Hospital et al, 2019 ONSC 4996. These decisions do not assist as both decisions were made at trial by the trial [18] Accordingly, I am......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 firm's commentaries
-
The Uncertainty Behind Ontario's Limitation Periods
...et al v. Credit Valley Hospital et al, 2019 ONSC 4996, the Ontario Supreme Court of Justice provided guidance on some key evidentiary issues: 1) cross-examination of parties who have settled in multi-party litigation, and 2) the admissibility of PowerPoint and other demonstrative aids to fa......
-
Evidentiary Lessons From The Medical Malpractice Trenches
...et al v. Credit Valley Hospital et al, 2019 ONSC 4996, the Ontario Supreme Court of Justice provided guidance on some key evidentiary issues: 1) cross-examination of parties who have settled in multi-party litigation, and 2) the admissibility of PowerPoint and other demonstrative aids to fa......
-
Four Issues From Recent Jury Trial
...Cheeseman et al v. Credit Valley Hospital et al, 2019 ONSC 4996, the court examined four issues in relation to a jury The plaintiffs sued four physicians, a hospital, and several nurses. Prior to trial, the plaintiffs entered into a Pierringer Agreement with the hospital and the nurses. The......