Cherry v Alberta (Chief Electoral Officer),
| Judge | Honourable Madam Chief Justice M.T. Moreau |
| Neutral Citation | 2021 ABQB 672 |
| Citation | 2021 ABQB 672 |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Date | 23 August 2021 |
| Docket Number | 2010 00828 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
Maitland v Alberta (Election Commissioner),
...first time offenders ought to be assessed a penalty of between 10% of the amount in issue. In Cherry v Alberta (Chief Electoral Officer), 2021 ABQB 672, the penalty was varied downwards from $5,500 to 39 Certainly, the Election Commissioner has considerable discretion in assessing sanction,......
-
2023 ABKB 233,
...in his view, there were no mitigating factors is a palpable and overriding error. See also Cherry v Alberta (Chief Electoral Officer), 2021 ABQB 672, 2021 CarswellAlta 1999 where Moreau CJC, at paragraph 48, reduced an administrative penalty on the basis that “a larger reduction in p......
-
Callaway v Office of the Election Commissioner,
...in his view, there were no mitigating factors is a palpable and overriding error. See also Cherry v Alberta (Chief Electoral Officer), 2021 ABQB 672, 2021 CarswellAlta 1999 where Moreau CJC, at paragraph 48, reduced an administrative penalty on the basis that “a larger reduction in p......
-
Callaway v Office of the Election Commissioner,
...in his view, there were no mitigating factors is a palpable and overriding error. See also Cherry v Alberta (Chief Electoral Officer), 2021 ABQB 672, 2021 CarswellAlta 1999 where Moreau CJC, at paragraph 48, reduced an administrative penalty on the basis that “a larger reduction in p......
4 cases
-
Maitland v Alberta (Election Commissioner),
...first time offenders ought to be assessed a penalty of between 10% of the amount in issue. In Cherry v Alberta (Chief Electoral Officer), 2021 ABQB 672, the penalty was varied downwards from $5,500 to 39 Certainly, the Election Commissioner has considerable discretion in assessing sanction,......
-
Callaway v Office of the Election Commissioner,
...in his view, there were no mitigating factors is a palpable and overriding error. See also Cherry v Alberta (Chief Electoral Officer), 2021 ABQB 672, 2021 CarswellAlta 1999 where Moreau CJC, at paragraph 48, reduced an administrative penalty on the basis that “a larger reduction in p......
-
2023 ABKB 233,
...in his view, there were no mitigating factors is a palpable and overriding error. See also Cherry v Alberta (Chief Electoral Officer), 2021 ABQB 672, 2021 CarswellAlta 1999 where Moreau CJC, at paragraph 48, reduced an administrative penalty on the basis that “a larger reduction in p......
-
Callaway v Office of the Election Commissioner,
...in his view, there were no mitigating factors is a palpable and overriding error. See also Cherry v Alberta (Chief Electoral Officer), 2021 ABQB 672, 2021 CarswellAlta 1999 where Moreau CJC, at paragraph 48, reduced an administrative penalty on the basis that “a larger reduction in p......