Cheung v. Samra
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Ontario) |
| Judge | Brown,Pardu,Simmons |
| Citation | 2022 ONCA 195 |
| Docket Number | C69134 |
| Date | 09 March 2022 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
4 practice notes
-
Henry v Zaitlen
...Guardian of) v. Olupona, 2013 ONCA 259, 305 O.A.C. 245; Sacks v. Ross, 2017 ONCA 773, 417 D.L.R. (4th) 387, and Cheung v. Samra, 2022 ONCA 195. The standard of review of civil jury verdicts is “exceptionally high”: Cheung, at para. 50, citing Stilwell, at para. 33. So long as there is some ......
-
Fedoriuk v Howard
...the defendants' formulation of the causation question will be used in this case. Issue 2: Reasons/Particulars: 59 Cheung v. Samra, 2022 ONCA 195, is an important decision in this analysis. Following a difficult birth, the plaintiff suffered a seizure at two and a half months old and suffere......
-
Meldazy v Nassar
...and that, in rendering their verdict, they properly consider the evidence and the issues and follow the instructions: Cheung v. Samra, 2022 ONCA 195, 467 D.L.R. (4th) 708 (“ Cheung (ONCA)”), at para. 24 Subsections 108(4), (5) and (6) of the Courts of Justice Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C.43 provi......
-
Maher v Kiric
...to by”. Particulars 4 Whether to ask the jury to provide particulars is in the discretion of the trial judge: Cheung v. Samra, 2022 ONCA 195 at para. 71 (leave to appeal denied: 2022 CanLII 115633 5 There is a presumption that juries understand and properly apply the trial judge's instructi......
4 cases
-
Henry v Zaitlen
...Guardian of) v. Olupona, 2013 ONCA 259, 305 O.A.C. 245; Sacks v. Ross, 2017 ONCA 773, 417 D.L.R. (4th) 387, and Cheung v. Samra, 2022 ONCA 195. The standard of review of civil jury verdicts is “exceptionally high”: Cheung, at para. 50, citing Stilwell, at para. 33. So long as there is some ......
-
Fedoriuk v Howard
...the defendants' formulation of the causation question will be used in this case. Issue 2: Reasons/Particulars: 59 Cheung v. Samra, 2022 ONCA 195, is an important decision in this analysis. Following a difficult birth, the plaintiff suffered a seizure at two and a half months old and suffere......
-
Meldazy v Nassar
...and that, in rendering their verdict, they properly consider the evidence and the issues and follow the instructions: Cheung v. Samra, 2022 ONCA 195, 467 D.L.R. (4th) 708 (“ Cheung (ONCA)”), at para. 24 Subsections 108(4), (5) and (6) of the Courts of Justice Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C.43 provi......
-
Maher v Kiric
...to by”. Particulars 4 Whether to ask the jury to provide particulars is in the discretion of the trial judge: Cheung v. Samra, 2022 ONCA 195 at para. 71 (leave to appeal denied: 2022 CanLII 115633 5 There is a presumption that juries understand and properly apply the trial judge's instructi......
