Chieftain Metals Inc. v. Tulsequah Wilderness Adventures Inc. et al., [2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1251 (SC)
| Judge | Adair, J. |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Case Date | July 08, 2014 |
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Citations | [2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1251 (SC);[2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1251;2014 BCSC 1251 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Kew v. Konarski, 2020 ONSC 4677
...4, at paragraph 28, and the authorities noted therein. See, in particular: Chieftain Metals Inc. v. Tulsequah Wilderness Adventures Inc., 2014 BCSC 1251 (S.C.); and Oliveira v. Zareh (2015), 21 C.C.L.T. (4th) 269 (S.C.J.). [24] See Klar, supra, Chapter 4, at paragraph 29, and the authoritie......
-
Skeena Resources Ltd v Mill,
...on the principle to prove a specific intent to surrender ownership: see Chieftain Metals Inc. v. Tulsequah Wilderness Adventures Inc., 2014 BCSC 1251 at para. 72 and the authorities cited 44 It is therefore my opinion that the issues raised by Skeena have sufficient merit to warrant review ......
2 cases
-
Kew v. Konarski, 2020 ONSC 4677
...4, at paragraph 28, and the authorities noted therein. See, in particular: Chieftain Metals Inc. v. Tulsequah Wilderness Adventures Inc., 2014 BCSC 1251 (S.C.); and Oliveira v. Zareh (2015), 21 C.C.L.T. (4th) 269 (S.C.J.). [24] See Klar, supra, Chapter 4, at paragraph 29, and the authoritie......
-
Skeena Resources Ltd v Mill,
...on the principle to prove a specific intent to surrender ownership: see Chieftain Metals Inc. v. Tulsequah Wilderness Adventures Inc., 2014 BCSC 1251 at para. 72 and the authorities cited 44 It is therefore my opinion that the issues raised by Skeena have sufficient merit to warrant review ......