Chisan v Fielding, 2017 ABQB 233
| Judge | Eamon |
| Subject Matter | PRACTICE,COURTS |
| Citation | 2017 ABQB 233 |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Docket Number | 1601 06249 |
| Date | 31 March 2017 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 practice notes
-
Chisan v Klooster,
...Brian Chisan” is subject to court access restrictions in the Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench: Chisan v Fielding, 2017 ABQB 233; Chisan v Akers, 2020 ABQB 659 . That means “James Brian Chisan” is prohibited from initiating litigation at the Alberta Court of Queen&......
-
ET v Rocky Mountain Play Therapy Institute Inc, 2017 ABQB 475
...2016 ABCA 170 at para 38. Regardless, these indicators “... provide a useful guide to assessing a litigant’s conduct”. Chisan v Fielding, 2017 ABQB 233 at para [73] In addition, I may also take into account ET’s behaviour in non-judicial proceedings. In Bishop v Bishop, 2011 ONCA 211, Rosen......
-
Chisan v Akers,
...a vexatious litigant and made subject to Judicature Act, RSA 2000, c J-2, ss 23-23.1 court access restrictions: Chisan v Fielding, 2017 ABQB 233. Mr. Chisan was prohibited from initiating or continuing proceedings that involve the City of Calgary [the City] and persons associated with the [......
-
Chisan v Klooster,
...Brian Chisan” was first made subject to court access restrictions by Eamon J in a Decision reported as Chisan v Fielding, 2017 ABQB 233. That decision documents 25 years of abusive litigation by “James Brian Chisan”, and prohibited “James Brian Chisan” fro......
Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
-
Chisan v Klooster,
...Brian Chisan” is subject to court access restrictions in the Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench: Chisan v Fielding, 2017 ABQB 233; Chisan v Akers, 2020 ABQB 659 . That means “James Brian Chisan” is prohibited from initiating litigation at the Alberta Court of Queen&......
-
ET v Rocky Mountain Play Therapy Institute Inc, 2017 ABQB 475
...2016 ABCA 170 at para 38. Regardless, these indicators “... provide a useful guide to assessing a litigant’s conduct”. Chisan v Fielding, 2017 ABQB 233 at para [73] In addition, I may also take into account ET’s behaviour in non-judicial proceedings. In Bishop v Bishop, 2011 ONCA 211, Rosen......
-
Chisan v Akers,
...a vexatious litigant and made subject to Judicature Act, RSA 2000, c J-2, ss 23-23.1 court access restrictions: Chisan v Fielding, 2017 ABQB 233. Mr. Chisan was prohibited from initiating or continuing proceedings that involve the City of Calgary [the City] and persons associated with the [......
-
Chisan v Klooster,
...Brian Chisan” was first made subject to court access restrictions by Eamon J in a Decision reported as Chisan v Fielding, 2017 ABQB 233. That decision documents 25 years of abusive litigation by “James Brian Chisan”, and prohibited “James Brian Chisan” fro......
Request a trial to view additional results