Chokler v. FCA Canada Inc,

JurisdictionOntario
JudgeBaltman
Neutral Citation2017 ONSC 4494
Docket NumberCV-15-4429-00SR
Citation2017 ONSC 4494
Subject MatterEVIDENCE,PRACTICE
Date27 July 2017
CourtSuperior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (January 23 ' 27, 2023)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 31 Enero 2023
    ...2012 ONSC 4902, Cromb v. Bouwmeester, 2014 ONSC 5318, Alofs v. Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP, 2017 ONSC 950, Chokler v. FCA Canada Inc. 2017 ONSC 4494, Conway v. Law Society of Upper Canada, [2016] O.J. No. 451, Gloucester Organization Inc. v. Canadian Newsletter Managers Inc. (1995), 21 O.R......
  • 2023 ONCA 51,
    • Canada
    • 1 Enero 2023
    ...test: see for instance, Alofs v. Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP, 2017 ONSC 950, at paras. 22-23; Chokler v. FCA Canada Inc. 2017, ONSC 4494, at para. 20 The appellants concede that (i) the motion judge correctly noted that the language of Rule 26.01 defines the scope of the exercise of th......
  • Horani v Manulife Financial Corporation,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • 25 Enero 2023
    ...test: see for instance, Alofs v. Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP, 2017 ONSC 950, at paras. 22-23; Chokler v. FCA Canada Inc. 2017, ONSC 4494, at para. 20 The appellants concede that (i) the motion judge correctly noted that the language of Rule 26.01 defines the scope of the exercise of th......
  • 1351150 Ontario Inc. et al v. The Corporation of the Town of Hawkesbury, 2018 ONSC 2631
    • Canada
    • Ontario Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 24 Abril 2018
    ...to grant leave would be manifestly unjust” (Ginkel v. East Asia Minerals Corp., 2010 ONSC 905, at para. 17; Chokler v. FCA Canada Inc., 2017 ONSC 4494, at paras. c. The cross-motion is subject to the doctrine of issue estoppel, as Arnco’s document production and responses have already been ......
3 cases
  • 2023 ONCA 51,
    • Canada
    • 1 Enero 2023
    ...test: see for instance, Alofs v. Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP, 2017 ONSC 950, at paras. 22-23; Chokler v. FCA Canada Inc. 2017, ONSC 4494, at para. 20 The appellants concede that (i) the motion judge correctly noted that the language of Rule 26.01 defines the scope of the exercise of th......
  • Horani v Manulife Financial Corporation,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • 25 Enero 2023
    ...test: see for instance, Alofs v. Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP, 2017 ONSC 950, at paras. 22-23; Chokler v. FCA Canada Inc. 2017, ONSC 4494, at para. 20 The appellants concede that (i) the motion judge correctly noted that the language of Rule 26.01 defines the scope of the exercise of th......
  • 1351150 Ontario Inc. et al v. The Corporation of the Town of Hawkesbury, 2018 ONSC 2631
    • Canada
    • Ontario Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 24 Abril 2018
    ...to grant leave would be manifestly unjust” (Ginkel v. East Asia Minerals Corp., 2010 ONSC 905, at para. 17; Chokler v. FCA Canada Inc., 2017 ONSC 4494, at paras. c. The cross-motion is subject to the doctrine of issue estoppel, as Arnco’s document production and responses have already been ......
1 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (January 23 ' 27, 2023)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 31 Enero 2023
    ...2012 ONSC 4902, Cromb v. Bouwmeester, 2014 ONSC 5318, Alofs v. Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP, 2017 ONSC 950, Chokler v. FCA Canada Inc. 2017 ONSC 4494, Conway v. Law Society of Upper Canada, [2016] O.J. No. 451, Gloucester Organization Inc. v. Canadian Newsletter Managers Inc. (1995), 21 O.R......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT