Director of Civil Forfeiture (B.C.) v. Violette et al., [2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1372 (SC)
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Davies, J. |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | PRACTICE |
| Citation | [2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1372 (SC),2015 BCSC 1372,[2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1372 |
| Date | 14 May 2015 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
25 practice notes
-
British Columbia v. Apotex Inc.,
...it is plain and obvious that the proposed amendments are bound to fail: British Columbia (Director of Civil Forfeiture) v. Violette, 2015 BCSC 1372 at para. 40 [48] In Continental Steel Ltd. v. CTL Steel Ltd., 2014 BCSC 104, Justice Kent helpfully s......
-
British Columbia (Director of Civil Forfeiture) v. Angel Acres Recreation and Festival Property Ltd., 2020 BCSC 880
...application to again amend his pleadings, in Reasons for Judgment indexed as British Columbia (Director of Civil Forfeiture) v. Violette, 2015 BCSC 1372 [Violette], I concluded 1) The defendants’ submission that the pleadings did not disclose a cause of action was in substance the same as t......
-
E.B. v. British Columbia (Child, Family and Community Services), 2019 BCSC 2200
...an amendment where it is plain and obvious the amendment is bound to fail: British Columbia (Director of Civil Forfeiture) v. Violette, 2015 BCSC 1372 at paras. [85] That is not to say that amendments will never be refused. In The Owners, Strata Plan LMS3259 v. Sze Hang Holdings Inc., 2009 ......
-
Pinkerton v. Victoria Saanich Canadian Dressage Owners and Riders Society,
...[70] The plaintiffs seek to further amend the notice of civil claim. In British Columbia (Director of Civil Forfeiture) v. Violette, 2015 BCSC 1372, Davies J. summarized the applicable [39] In Mayer v. Mayer, 2012 BCCA 77 at para. 215, the Court of Appeal affirmed that the fundamental purpo......
Request a trial to view additional results
25 cases
-
British Columbia v. Apotex Inc.,
...it is plain and obvious that the proposed amendments are bound to fail: British Columbia (Director of Civil Forfeiture) v. Violette, 2015 BCSC 1372 at para. 40 [48] In Continental Steel Ltd. v. CTL Steel Ltd., 2014 BCSC 104, Justice Kent helpfully s......
-
British Columbia (Director of Civil Forfeiture) v. Angel Acres Recreation and Festival Property Ltd., 2020 BCSC 880
...application to again amend his pleadings, in Reasons for Judgment indexed as British Columbia (Director of Civil Forfeiture) v. Violette, 2015 BCSC 1372 [Violette], I concluded 1) The defendants’ submission that the pleadings did not disclose a cause of action was in substance the same as t......
-
E.B. v. British Columbia (Child, Family and Community Services), 2019 BCSC 2200
...an amendment where it is plain and obvious the amendment is bound to fail: British Columbia (Director of Civil Forfeiture) v. Violette, 2015 BCSC 1372 at paras. [85] That is not to say that amendments will never be refused. In The Owners, Strata Plan LMS3259 v. Sze Hang Holdings Inc., 2009 ......
-
Pinkerton v. Victoria Saanich Canadian Dressage Owners and Riders Society,
...[70] The plaintiffs seek to further amend the notice of civil claim. In British Columbia (Director of Civil Forfeiture) v. Violette, 2015 BCSC 1372, Davies J. summarized the applicable [39] In Mayer v. Mayer, 2012 BCCA 77 at para. 215, the Court of Appeal affirmed that the fundamental purpo......
Request a trial to view additional results