Clark v. Canadian National Railway Co.

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
JudgeDickson, Robert George Brian; Beetz, Jean; McIntyre, William Rogers; Lamer, Antonio; Wilson, Bertha; Le Dain, Gerald Eric; L'Heureux-Dubé, Claire
Citation[1988] 2 SCR 680,32 CPC (2d) 97,226 APR 116,54 DLR (4th) 679,89 NBR (2d) 116,47 CCLT 1,89 NR 81,1988 CanLII 18 (SCC)
Date15 December 1988
Docket Number19299

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
56 practice notes
  • R. v. Henry (D.B.) et al.
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • January 12, 2005
    ...683; 194 N.R. 181; 72 B.C.A.C. 161; 119 W.A.C. 161, refd to. [para. 44]. Clark v. Canadian National Railway Co. and New Brunswick, [1988] 2 S.C.R. 680; 89 N.R. 81; 89 N.B.R.(2d) 116; 226 A.P.R. 116, refd to. [para. 44]. United States of America v. Burns and Rafay, [2001] 1 S.C.R. 283; 265 N......
  • R. v. Henry
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • December 15, 2005
    ...3 S.C.R. 1303; R. v. B. (K.G.), [1993] 1 S.C.R. 740; R. v. Robinson, [1996] 1 S.C.R. 683; Clark v. Canadian National Railway Co., [1988] 2 S.C.R. 680; United States v. Burns, [2001] 1 S.C.R. 283, 2001 SCC 7; Kindler v. Canada (Minister of Justice), [1991] 2 S.C.R. 779; Reference re Ng Extra......
  • R. v. Henry (D.B.) et al.
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • January 12, 2005
    ...683; 194 N.R. 181; 72 B.C.A.C. 161; 119 W.A.C. 161, refd to. [para. 44]. Clark v. Canadian National Railway Co. and New Brunswick, [1988] 2 S.C.R. 680; 89 N.R. 81; 89 N.B.R.(2d) 116; 226 A.P.R. 116, refd to. [para. 44]. United States of America v. Burns and Rafay, [2001] 1 S.C.R. 283; 265 N......
  • Quebec (Attorney General) v. Canada (Attorney General) et al.
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • March 27, 2015
    ...Workers of Canada, [1980] 1 S.C.R. 115; 28 N.R. 107, refd to. [para. 184]. Clark v. Canadian National Railway Co. and New Brunswick, [1988] 2 S.C.R. 680; 89 N.R. 81; 89 N.B.R.(2d) 116; 226 A.P.R. 116, refd to. [para. 184]. Foundation Co. of Canada Ltd. v. Canada and Thomas Fuller Constructi......
  • Get Started for Free
51 cases
  • R. v. Henry
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • December 15, 2005
    ...3 S.C.R. 1303; R. v. B. (K.G.), [1993] 1 S.C.R. 740; R. v. Robinson, [1996] 1 S.C.R. 683; Clark v. Canadian National Railway Co., [1988] 2 S.C.R. 680; United States v. Burns, [2001] 1 S.C.R. 283, 2001 SCC 7; Kindler v. Canada (Minister of Justice), [1991] 2 S.C.R. 779; Reference re Ng Extra......
  • R. v. Henry (D.B.) et al.
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • January 12, 2005
    ...683; 194 N.R. 181; 72 B.C.A.C. 161; 119 W.A.C. 161, refd to. [para. 44]. Clark v. Canadian National Railway Co. and New Brunswick, [1988] 2 S.C.R. 680; 89 N.R. 81; 89 N.B.R.(2d) 116; 226 A.P.R. 116, refd to. [para. 44]. United States of America v. Burns and Rafay, [2001] 1 S.C.R. 283; 265 N......
  • Quebec (Attorney General) v. Canada (Attorney General) et al.
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • March 27, 2015
    ...Workers of Canada, [1980] 1 S.C.R. 115; 28 N.R. 107, refd to. [para. 184]. Clark v. Canadian National Railway Co. and New Brunswick, [1988] 2 S.C.R. 680; 89 N.R. 81; 89 N.B.R.(2d) 116; 226 A.P.R. 116, refd to. [para. 184]. Foundation Co. of Canada Ltd. v. Canada and Thomas Fuller Constructi......
  • R. v. Kirkpatrick
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • July 29, 2022
    ...[1951] S.C.R. 679; Deacon v. The King, [1947] S.C.R. 531; R. v. Beaulac, [1999] 1 S.C.R. 768; Clark v. Canadian National Railway Co., [1988] 2 S.C.R. 680; Ordon Estate v. Grail, [1998] 3 S.C.R. 437; R. v. Mabior, 2012 SCC 47, [2012] 2 S.C.R. 584; referred to: Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC ......
  • Get Started for Free
6 books & journal articles
  • The demise and rise of the classical paradigm in Canadian federalism: promoting autonomy for the provinces and First Nations.
    • Canada
    • McGill Law Journal Vol. 46 No. 2, April 2001
    • April 1, 2001
    ...Relations and Disputes Investigation Act, [1955] S.C.R. 529, 3 D.L.R. 721). See also Clark v. Canadian National Railway Co., [1988] 2 S.C.R. 680, 17 D.L.R. (4th) 58 [hereinafter Clark cited to S.C.R.]. However, in most of these cases, federal statutes have been read down because their spill......
  • Copyrights, federalism, and the constitutionality of Canada's private copying levy.
    • Canada
    • McGill Law Journal Vol. 51 No. 4, December 2006
    • December 22, 2006
    ...Ltd. v. Communications Workers of Canada (1979), [1980] 1 S.C.R. 115 at 138, 98 D.L.R. (3d) 1; Clark v. Canadian National Railway Co., [1988] 2 S.C.R. 680 at 708, 54 D.L.R. (4th) (97) Vapor Canada, supra note 15 at 159. (98) Ibid.; see also General Motors, supra note 89 at 668. (99) General......
  • EXCLUSIVELY YOURS: RECONSIDERING INTERJURISDICTIONAL IMMUNITY.
    • Canada
    • University of British Columbia Law Review Vol. 52 No. 2, June 2019
    • June 1, 2019
    ...does not come within federal legislative authority. See General Motors, supra note 13 at 678. (66) See Elliot, supra note 8 at 469. (67) [1988] 2 SCR 680, 54 DLR (4th) 679 (68) 2006 SCC 41 [Isen]. (69) Elliot, supra note 8 at 469. In a much earlier case commentary, Elliot lists several earl......
  • A tale of two section twenty-fours: towards a comprehensive approach for charter remedies.
    • Canada
    • University of Toronto Faculty of Law Review Vol. 70 No. 2, March 2012
    • March 22, 2012
    ...SCC 6, [2010] 1 SCR 206 [Nasogaluak]. (10) R v Henry, 2005 SCC 76, [2005] 3 SCR 609 [Henry]. (11) Clark v Canadian National Railway Co, [1988] 2 SCR 680 at (12) Henry, supra note 10 at para 44. (13) Two judges of the Saskatchewan provincial court attempted to do so, but both were overturned......
  • Get Started for Free