Cloval Developments Inc. v. Koledin and Koledin, (1984) 1 O.A.C. 368 (CA)

JudgeArnup, Blair and Weatherston, JJ.A.
CourtCourt of Appeal (Ontario)
Case DateDecember 13, 1983
JurisdictionOntario
Citations(1984), 1 O.A.C. 368 (CA)

Cloval Dev. Inc. v. Koledin (1984), 1 O.A.C. 368 (CA)

MLB headnote and full text

Cloval Developments Inc. v. Koledin and Koledin

Indexed As: Cloval Developments Inc. v. Koledin and Koledin

Ontario Court of Appeal

Arnup, Blair and Weatherston, JJ.A.

January 16, 1984.

Summary:

A mortgagor's successor-in-title applied to permit payment into court of the amount due under the mortgage and for an order that the mortgage be discharged. The issue was whether a prepayment clause in the mortgage was incorporated into an agreement extending the mortgage.

The Ontario High Court, in a decision unreported in this series of reports, dismissed the application. The successor-in-title appealed.

The Ontario Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal.

Mortgages - Topic 2983

Payment of mortgage - Prepayment - Loss of right or privilege - The Ontario Court of Appeal held that a clause in a mortgage permitting prepayment at any time without notice or bonus could not be carried forward into an agreement extending the time for repayment and providing new terms of repayment of the mortgage - The court held that since the prepayment privilege was not expressly provided in the extension agreement, it was lost - See paragraphs 9 to 10.

Counsel:

F. Battiston, for the appellant, Cloval;

G.W. McKechnie, Q.C., for the respondents.

This appeal was heard before Arnup, Blair and Weatherston, JJ.A., of the Ontario Court of Appeal, on December 13, 1983. The decision of the Court of Appeal was delivered orally by Weatherston, J.A., and released on January 16, 1984.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 practice notes
  • Pucci v. Kotsovolos, (1999) 93 O.T.C. 157 (GD)
    • Canada
    • Ontario Ontario Court of Justice General Division (Canada)
    • February 23, 1999
    ...of mortgage - Default - What constitutes - See paragraphs 1 to 20. Cases Noticed: Cloval Developments Inc. v. Koledin and Koledin (1984), 1 O.A.C. 368; 44 O.R.(2d) 261 (C.A.), consd. [para. Petrillo v. Nelson (1980), 29 O.R.(2d) 791 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 14]. Hongkong Bank of Canada v. Wh......
1 cases
  • Pucci v. Kotsovolos, (1999) 93 O.T.C. 157 (GD)
    • Canada
    • Ontario Ontario Court of Justice General Division (Canada)
    • February 23, 1999
    ...of mortgage - Default - What constitutes - See paragraphs 1 to 20. Cases Noticed: Cloval Developments Inc. v. Koledin and Koledin (1984), 1 O.A.C. 368; 44 O.R.(2d) 261 (C.A.), consd. [para. Petrillo v. Nelson (1980), 29 O.R.(2d) 791 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 14]. Hongkong Bank of Canada v. Wh......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT