Your World of Legal Intelligence
 Canada | +1 (343) 700 0450

Coast-to-Coast Ind. v. 1657483 Ont., [2010] O.T.C. Uned. 2011

Document Cited authorities 4 Cited in 47 Precedent Map Related
Vincent
JudgeStrathy, J.
CourtSuperior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
Case DateApril 08, 2010
JurisdictionOntario
Citations[2010] O.T.C. Uned. 2011;[2010] O.T.C. Uned. 2011 (SC);2010 ONSC 2011
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
8 practice notes
  • Moss v. BMO Nesbitt Burns Inc., 2013 MBQB 127
    • Canada
    • Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench of Manitoba (Canada)
    • June 10, 2013
    ...207 W.A.C. 287, refd to. [para. 49]. Coast-to-Coast Industrial Development Co. v. 1657483 Ontario Inc. et al., [2010] O.T.C. Uned. 2011; 2010 ONSC 2011, refd to. [para. Hunt v. T & N plc et al., [1990] 2 S.C.R. 959; 117 N.R. 321, refd to. [para. 51]. Hunt v. Carey Canada Inc. - see Hunt......
  • Part I, Vol. 146, No. 16
    • Canada
    • Canada Gazette April 21, 2012
    • Invalid date
    ...21, 2012 None of the liquidity or other swaps were accessed, by Aucun des accords de swap de liquidités ou des autres either party, in 2011 or 2010. No related commitments accords de swap n’a été utilisé par l’une ou l’autre partie exist at December 31, 2011 ($Nil at December 31, 2010, en 2......
  • Mark T Johnson Professional Corporation v Vanshaw Enterprises Ltd,
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • September 21, 2023
    ...River Pile & Dredge Ltd v Can-Dive Services Ltd, [1999] 3 SCR 108; Coast-to-Coast Industrial Development Co v 1657483 Ontario Inc, 2010 ONSC 2011; Sattva Capital Corp v Creston Moly Corp, 2014 SCC 53. By the Court Beswick v Beswick [1966] 3 All ER 1, [1967] 2 All ER 1197 (HL); SM Waddam......
  • DESCO PLUMBING AND HEATING SUPPLY INC. v. AVN PLUMBING LIMITED et al.,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • November 9, 2020
    ...a contracting party was considered by Strathy J, (as he then was) in Coast-to-Coast Industrial Development Co. v. 1657483 Ontario Inc., 2010 ONSC 2011 (S.C.J.). At para.44 he observed, While the principled exception to privity of contract is not restricted to defensive provisions, it seems ......
    • Request a trial to view additional results
7 cases
  • Moss v. BMO Nesbitt Burns Inc., 2013 MBQB 127
    • Canada
    • Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench of Manitoba (Canada)
    • June 10, 2013
    ...207 W.A.C. 287, refd to. [para. 49]. Coast-to-Coast Industrial Development Co. v. 1657483 Ontario Inc. et al., [2010] O.T.C. Uned. 2011; 2010 ONSC 2011, refd to. [para. Hunt v. T & N plc et al., [1990] 2 S.C.R. 959; 117 N.R. 321, refd to. [para. 51]. Hunt v. Carey Canada Inc. - see Hunt......
  • Mark T Johnson Professional Corporation v Vanshaw Enterprises Ltd,
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • September 21, 2023
    ...River Pile & Dredge Ltd v Can-Dive Services Ltd, [1999] 3 SCR 108; Coast-to-Coast Industrial Development Co v 1657483 Ontario Inc, 2010 ONSC 2011; Sattva Capital Corp v Creston Moly Corp, 2014 SCC 53. By the Court Beswick v Beswick [1966] 3 All ER 1, [1967] 2 All ER 1197 (HL); SM Waddam......
  • DESCO PLUMBING AND HEATING SUPPLY INC. v. AVN PLUMBING LIMITED et al.,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • November 9, 2020
    ...a contracting party was considered by Strathy J, (as he then was) in Coast-to-Coast Industrial Development Co. v. 1657483 Ontario Inc., 2010 ONSC 2011 (S.C.J.). At para.44 he observed, While the principled exception to privity of contract is not restricted to defensive provisions, it seems ......
  • Stevens v. Nexterra Substructures Incorporated,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • January 24, 2022
    ...can be seen as consistent with Strathy J.’s observation in Coast-to-Coast Industrial Development Co. v. 1657483 Ontario Inc., 2010 ONSC 2011, paragraph 44, that the principled exception to privity of contract is not restricted to defensive provisions. I think that Arora overruled the......
    • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT