Cole v. Paterson, 2019 BCSC 45
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Donegan |
| Citation | 2019 BCSC 45 |
| Docket Number | S118186 |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Date | 15 January 2019 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Schriemer v. Harris, 2021 BCSC 1490
...v. Guitonni, 2011 BCCA 393 [Hofer]; Goodwin v. Ridley, 2006 BCCA 581 [Goodwin]; Jabs v. Good, 2009 BCSC 320 [Jabs]; and Cole v. Paterson, 2019 BCSC 45 [Cole]. The Harrises’ Position [13] The Harrises argue that the Tree Restriction Clause is ......
-
Skene v. Ucluelet (District), 2019 BCSC 2051
...principle has been consistently affirmed: 585582 B.C. Ltd. v. Anderson, 2015 BCCA 261 at para. 21 [585582 B.C. Ltd.]; Cole v. Paterson, 2019 BCSC 45 at para. 42 [42] In 585582 B.C. Ltd., Tysoe J.A. considered whether a covenant was invalid due to uncertainty. In that case, Tysoe J.A. observ......
2 cases
-
Schriemer v. Harris,
...v. Guitonni, 2011 BCCA 393 [Hofer]; Goodwin v. Ridley, 2006 BCCA 581 [Goodwin]; Jabs v. Good, 2009 BCSC 320 [Jabs]; and Cole v. Paterson, 2019 BCSC 45 [Cole]. The Harrises’ Position [13] The Harrises argue that the Tree Restriction Clause is ......
-
Skene v. Ucluelet (District), 2019 BCSC 2051
...principle has been consistently affirmed: 585582 B.C. Ltd. v. Anderson, 2015 BCCA 261 at para. 21 [585582 B.C. Ltd.]; Cole v. Paterson, 2019 BCSC 45 at para. 42 [42] In 585582 B.C. Ltd., Tysoe J.A. considered whether a covenant was invalid due to uncertainty. In that case, Tysoe J.A. observ......